Ambient Scribes
T

TORTUS

TORTUS is a UK clinical AI company built around NHS deployment, with over 2.5 million consultations recorded across ambulance clinical hubs, emergency departments, outpatients and general practice, the last through the X-on partnership. Its OSLER agent combines voice, vision and click based interaction to read screen context and act inside the record rather than only writing to it, generating notes, referral letters and coding for clinician approval. On 24 June 2026 it was certified as a UKCA Class IIa medical device by a UK Approved Body, and it holds ISO 13485, ISO 27001 and Cyber Essentials Plus certification.

TORTUS documents its own error rates. The Shell is a safety layer that verifies each generated statement against the consultation and removes anything unsupported before the clinician sees it, with a live platform figure of 92.7 percent of detected hallucinations removed and a 75 percent major hallucination reduction published in npj Digital Medicine. CREOLA, its clinician in the loop evaluation system, produced a clinical ontology of hallucination and omission in ambient scribes. TORTUS took part in Phase II of the MHRA AI Airlock and co developed the UK regulatory pathway for ambient voice technology with the regulator.

It runs on Google Cloud, lists OpenAI among its subprocessors, and keeps no patient audio at rest. NHS trusts can buy TORTUS Enterprise on the G-Cloud framework at £200,000 a year for up to 100,000 hours of audio, then £2 an hour, and its subscriber terms are for clinicians treating patients in the United Kingdom.

AI Health Index verifiedSeptember 15, 2026
Compare TORTUS with other vendors
Founded
2022
Headquarters
London, United Kingdom
Website
tortus.ai/
Categories
ambient-scribes
Indexed Products
OSLER, TORTUS Ambient Voice Technology, The Shell, CREOLA, TORTUS Enterprise for NHS Trusts, Surgery Intellect (with X-on Health)
Assessment

Capability Axes

An AI Health Index grade measures what a buyer can verify from public sources on the date shown. It is not a rating of how good the product is. A vendor can build an excellent system and grade low on an axis because it publishes nothing an outsider can check. How grades read

AI Capability
AA on AI CentralityThe artificial intelligence is the product. Remove the model and there is nothing left to sell.
Vendor Published

The models and the safety layer around them are the whole product. OSLER, the agent, listens to the consultation and combines voice, vision and click based interaction to read what is on screen and act inside the record, generating notes, referral letters, patient communications and coding for clinician approval. The Shell verifies each generated statement against the consultation before anyone sees it, and CREOLA, the company's clinician in the loop evaluation system, measures where the models go wrong.

There is no non AI business underneath. Without the speech recognition, generation and verification models there is nothing left to sell.

AA on Autonomy and Oversight ModelWhat the system may do and what it may not do are both published, with escalation thresholds, override paths and the conditions that route a case to a person.
Vendor Published

Filtering happens before the clinician sees anything, not only after. The Shell verifies every generated statement against the consultation itself and removes anything unsupported, so a reviewer is never shown a fabrication to miss, and the rate at which that filter works is published. Clinician approval remains the final gate, which a deploying clinician frames as professional responsibility rather than a workflow step.

OSLER also acts inside the record through vision and clicks, a wider surface than note generation, and the published safety metrics cover documentation content rather than those actions.

AA on Model and Technology TransparencyWhat is under the hood is named: proprietary or adapted foundation models identified, training data characterized, and versioning and update practice published so a buyer knows when the system changed.
Vendor Published

How the models fail, and how often, is documented. The Shell removes 92.7 percent of detected hallucinations on the live platform, and a peer reviewed paper in npj Digital Medicine reports a 75 percent reduction in major hallucinations. CREOLA, the company's clinician in the loop labeling platform, produced a clinical ontology of hallucination and omission in ambient scribes, sorting errors by type and by their potential to affect diagnosis or treatment, from a study that reviewed more than 49,000 transcript sentences and 13,000 clinical note sentences with over 100 clinicians.

A taxonomy with rates attached turns a vague worry about AI notes into a defined list of failure types a trust can monitor. Which underlying models generate the drafts is not stated; OpenAI appears on the company's subprocessor list.

BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an in house build, a cleared model that cannot be quietly swapped, or a deployment where the transfer does not occur at all. Naming the model provider exits the band below into this one; the axis rises from here on the completeness of the party list and on the terms that govern data once it arrives.
Vendor Published

The pipeline is set out step by step: speaker diarized audio is encrypted on the device, a draft is generated, and every statement passes the Shell's check against the consultation before a clinician sees it, with transcriptions, summaries and letters not stored in the system. TORTUS's trust center lists five subprocessors: Google Cloud Platform as cloud provider, OpenAI for engineering with an EU location, Auth0 for identity, Datadog for monitoring and LaunchDarkly. OpenAI is the one AI model company on the list.

Which steps use OpenAI's models, and the retention and training terms that apply to data reaching it, are not published. The addendum flows TORTUS's own obligations down to every subprocessor and offers a copy of any subprocessor agreement on request.

AA on Clinical and Operational EvidencePeer reviewed or independently evaluated performance, prospective and multi site where the claim requires it, with the method available to read. The grade describes the strength of the evidence, not its direction: a rigorous study that found no benefit grades by its design, and the note leads with what it found.
Third Party Estimated

The evidence comes from prospective, multi site, publicly funded work rather than vendor commissioned studies. TORTUS co ran a nine site ambient voice evaluation covering more than 17,000 patients with £500,000 of NHS England backing, evaluated independently by Great Ormond Street Hospital's DRIVE unit for NHS England, with results feeding the UK Government NHS Ten Year Plan for ambient voice technology and a Lancet submission under review.

A Phase II evaluation at Great Ormond Street Hospital, published with a named author list, studied ambient AI for pediatric documentation and reports better note quality and lower clinician cognitive load. Separate peer reviewed work in npj Digital Medicine underpins the safety figures.

AA on AI Safety and PHI StewardshipRetention windows, training use and de identification are all stated specifically enough to be contradicted. Safety engineering, meaning guardrails, hallucination mitigation and how a safety event is handled, does not gate this grade: no vendor in this index publishes it, so every note on this axis states that gap rather than leaving it implied.
Third Party Estimated

Neither patient audio nor training data is kept from customers. The company states that no model is trained on customer data and no data is retained, gives patient audio retained at rest as zero by design, and its data processing addendum says transcriptions, summaries and letters are not stored in the system; deleted data is cryptographically erased. Great Ormond Street Hospital independently tells its own patients that no patient data are held by the organization or used to train the AI, which puts the deploying hospital's name behind the commitment. A data processing impact assessment, now at version 9, sits in the trust center alongside full UK GDPR processor terms.

Beyond the Shell's statement checking, how a safety event is identified, escalated and closed is not described.

Regulatory and Compliance
BB on HIPAA and BAA PostureBusiness associate status is stated and supported by a substantive privacy document, with the agreement or its scope not fully published. For a vendor outside the United States, an equivalent regime documented to this depth grades here. A vendor whose product does not process protected health information grades here too when it says so plainly and explains the scope, with a service privacy document behind it: stating a position a buyer can rely on is the posture this axis grades, and the band above is closed to it because there is no agreement to publish.
Vendor Published

UK data protection law is the regime here. HIPAA is not claimed on the company's own material and appears only in third party listings, and the subscriber terms are limited to clinicians authorized to treat patients in the United Kingdom.

That home regime is documented in depth. The published data processing addendum names the subscriber as controller and TORTUS as processor and carries the Article 28 obligations in full: processing only on documented instructions, audit rights, flow down to subprocessors with a copy of any subprocessor agreement on request, breach notification without undue delay, help with data subject requests, transfer restrictions, and deletion or return of data at termination. It gives an ICO registration number and an NHS toolkit organization code. Those terms date from November 2024, before the current device certification, and a newer data processing agreement sits in the trust center.

Whether a business associate agreement is offered for United States use is not stated.

BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA recognized certification is named in the vendor own material without the artifact, or with a scope or renewal question the buyer has to raise. A recognized certification here is an audit of how the vendor operates security, such as SOC 2, HITRUST or ISO/IEC 27001. A certification has a scope and a clock, and both are part of this grade. A certification the vendor attaches to its data center, hosting facility or cloud provider, rather than presenting as its own, is the host's and does not count here.
Vendor Published

TORTUS holds ISO 27001:2022 certification from LRQA under UKAS accreditation, ISO 13485:2016 for its medical device quality management system since February 2026, and Cyber Essentials Plus. It exceeded the standards of the NHS Data Security and Protection Toolkit for 2024 to 2025 and meets the NHS Digital Technology Assessment Criteria. Its trust center holds the certificates, a January 2026 web application penetration test report, a data flow diagram and the DCB0129 clinical safety case report, and the published addendum commits to penetration testing at least once a year.

The certificates and reports are released on request rather than open to a visitor.

BB on FDA and Regulatory StatusThe pathway is stated and in progress, or a clearance is named without the vintage and scope a buyer needs to match it to the product on offer.
Vendor Published

A UK Approved Body, Scarlet (8536), certified the product on 24 June 2026 as a UKCA Class IIa medical device, described as clinical decision support, under a quality management system audited to ISO 13485. That replaced an earlier Class I self declaration: Class IIa requires an Approved Body to review the technical documentation and clinical evaluation, and carries an active post market surveillance plan. TORTUS also took part in Phase II of the MHRA AI Airlock and keeps DCB0129 and DCB0160 clinical safety documentation.

The certified intended purpose, whether it covers the whole product or specific functions, and the version certified are not stated publicly, and how far the certificate extends to OSLER acting inside the record through vision and clicks is not said. There is no FDA pathway and no United States market presence.

AA on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureA bias or fairness evaluation with a stated method, subgroup performance, or an independent audit of model behavior. Subgroup performance means published results compared across the groups the product serves, clinical and physiological as well as demographic, so a buyer can see where it underperforms.
Third Party Estimated

Accent performance has been tested by a deploying hospital. Great Ormond Street Hospital states publicly that its extensive evaluation covered a wide variety of accents and found the tool transcribed accurately across them, which addresses the failure mode in speech products where accuracy drops for speakers underrepresented in training.

CREOLA classifies errors by their potential clinical consequence rather than by frequency alone, so a documentation error that could change diagnosis or treatment counts for more than one that could not. A DCB0129 clinical safety case report sits in the trust center.

BB on AI Liability and RecourseA published falsifiable commitment, or a real correction route the affected person can exercise against the vendor. A published error rate with its method and denominator grades here. A statutory right that runs to the covered entity rather than to the vendor does not reach this band on its own: every other route here asks something of the vendor, and being located in a particular jurisdiction is not conduct.
Peer Reviewed Publication

The error rates can be checked against their methods. A peer reviewed paper in npj Digital Medicine reports a 75 percent reduction in major hallucinations, the live platform figure of 92.7 percent of detected hallucinations removed comes with its method, and the CREOLA ontology sorts errors by their potential to affect diagnosis or treatment. As a certified Class IIa device the product also carries a post market surveillance obligation, which TORTUS says its verification layer serves by monitoring live hallucination and omission rates.

The contract carries less. The published subscriber terms provide the service as is, disclaim any warranty of accuracy, cap liability at six months of fees, and require the subscriber to defend and indemnify TORTUS against third party claims, including claims from patients about the subscriber's care. Liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence is not excluded, as English law requires, and the manufacturer remains answerable under the device regime for defects in design, claims or monitoring.

Under UK data protection law a patient can have an inaccurate record corrected through the practice, and the addendum obliges TORTUS to help the controller do so. Those terms date from November 2024, before the device certification.

Integration and Deployment
BB on EHR and Interoperability DepthNamed systems with read access or one directional writing, or standards support with named deployments behind it.
Vendor Published

Integration runs inside NHS electronic patient records, natively and through an SDK, deep enough at Great Ormond Street to pick up patient identity automatically rather than relying on manual selection. General practice is reached through the X-on Health partnership, where TORTUS powers Surgery Intellect, which works with X-on's Surgery Connect telephony. OSLER can also operate a record system through its interface using vision and clicks, a route to breadth that does not wait for each record vendor to build an integration.

Integrations are concentrated in the NHS estate, and none outside the United Kingdom is named.

BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyOptions and residency are stated with isolation or the processing path left open.
Vendor Published

Google Cloud Platform hosts the service, and the G-Cloud listing places data storage and processing in the United Kingdom and the European Economic Area; OpenAI appears on the subprocessor list with an EU location. Little is held to begin with: patient audio retained at rest is zero by design, notes and letters are not stored in the system, and deleted data is cryptographically erased. Deployments go through NHS governance approval at trust level under UK GDPR.

Which Google Cloud regions are used, and which processing steps happen in the EU rather than the UK, are not stated.

Commercial
BB on Commercial TransparencyA price or a pricing basis is published without full tiers, so a buyer can size the cost before making contact.
Vendor Published

NHS prices are listed on the government's G-Cloud 15 framework. TORTUS Enterprise for NHS trusts costs £200,000 a year for up to 100,000 hours of audio processed, with unlimited user licenses across departments, then £2 an hour beyond that, and includes onboarding, site visits, template customization and a live reporting dashboard. Pilot offers, priced excluding VAT, ran until May 2026: three months with unlimited licenses for £30,000, three months for up to 100 or 30 licenses at £15,000 or £5,000, and a small pilot at £44 per license per month.

The listing also offers a free month of full service, and trusts can buy by direct award through the Crown Commercial Service marketplace; general practices get TORTUS through X-on's Surgery Intellect. Early adopters describe saving an average of four minutes per consultation, a figure reported by users rather than measured in a controlled comparison.

AA on Setting and Specialty CoverageWhere the product is validated to operate is named and supported, settings and specialties both, whether the coverage is broad or deliberately narrow.
Vendor Published

The setting spread runs from pre hospital care to general practice. TORTUS is documented in ambulance clinical hubs, emergency departments and outpatients as three deployments on one platform, in pediatrics at Great Ormond Street and in primary care through the X-on partnership, and the company cites more than 50 clinical settings from emergency care to mental health. Its enterprise offer is pitched at acute, community, mental health and ambulance trusts.

Ambulance and dispatch documentation is a harder acoustic and clinical environment than an outpatient room. The coverage is deep in the NHS and unevidenced elsewhere.

Alternatives

Alternatives to TORTUS

Vendors in the same categories as TORTUS whose graded profiles look most alike, with a line on what each product does.

Similar is not the same, so check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Nabla sells an ambient AI assistant that listens to the visit and drafts a structured clinical note, together with dictation and E/M coding suggestions, to health systems, medical groups…

Abridge is an enterprise ambient AI platform that turns the clinician patient conversation into a structured, billable note inside the EHR, sold to health systems rather than to individual clinicians.

Corti is a Copenhagen company that builds healthcare AI models and sells them as infrastructure.

Microsoft Dragon Copilot is the ambient clinical documentation assistant Microsoft created in March 2025 by merging DAX Copilot with Dragon Medical One, both from its 2022 acquisition of Nuance.

voize is a German voice documentation company built for nurses and caregivers rather than physicians, with its speech model running on the caregiver's device.

Heidi is a global ambient AI scribe that generates structured clinical notes from the patient encounter.

Ordered by how closely the graded profiles match across the fifteen axes, inside the same categories. See how each axis is graded in the methodology.

Comparisons

Compared With

Each comparison carries a written verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side. Pairs that cross a category boundary are grouped separately, and their verdicts state where the boundary sits rather than manufacturing a head to head.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

Entry Price Pricing Basis BAA Tier Implementation Source
£200,000 a year for NHS trusts for up to 100,000 hours of audio, then £2 an hour (G-Cloud 15); free first month on the listing
Hours of audio processed. TORTUS Enterprise for NHS trusts is an annual fee covering up to 100,000 hours with unlimited user licenses, with additional audio charged per hour. Pilot offers that ran until May 2026 were priced per pilot (£30,000, £15,000 or £5,000 for three months) or at £44 per license per month for up to 20 licenses. General practice access runs through X-on's Surgery Intellect. No business associate agreement position; the product is sold under United Kingdom data protection law. A full UK GDPR data processing addendum is published with the subscriber terms, naming TORTUS as processor. Included in the enterprise and pilot prices, which cover onboarding, site visits, template customization, change management and reporting; NHS deployments also go through trust level governance and clinical safety review before go live. Vendor Published

TORTUS's G-Cloud 15 pricing document sets TORTUS Enterprise for NHS trusts at £200,000 a year for up to 100,000 hours of audio processed and £2 an hour beyond that, with unlimited licenses. Time limited pilot offers valid until 31 May 2026, priced excluding VAT, set a three month unlimited pilot at £30,000, three month pilots for up to 100 or 30 licenses at £15,000 and £5,000, and a small pilot of up to 20 licenses at £44 per license per month. The listing offers a free month of full service, and trusts can buy by direct award through the Crown Commercial Service marketplace. No United States commercial motion is evidenced.