Healthcare Cybersecurity
A

Asimily

Asimily sells an exposure management platform for connected devices (medical devices, IoT, OT and IT endpoints), with hospitals and health systems as its founding market and customers in manufacturing, energy, finance and other sectors. An on-site Edge appliance monitors the network passively and with safe active queries to build a device inventory, and the platform ranks each vulnerability by how likely it is to be exploited on that device in that network, using what the company calls a patented algorithm that cross-references EPSS, SBOMs, CVE lists, MITRE ATT&CK and NIST guidance, alongside behavioral modeling of device traffic.

From there it recommends mitigations, orchestrates segmentation through the hospital's existing NAC and firewalls with a simulator to preview the effect, detects threats, captures packets for incident response, controls device configuration and patches IoT devices. Hospital-specific functions include matching FDA and manufacturer recalls to devices, ProSecure lookups of a device's risk before purchase (drawing on MDS2 statements and SBOMs), device utilization reporting and two-way sync with CMMS and CMDB systems.

The product security page says PII and ePHI never leave the Edge, runs each cloud customer on dedicated instances in its country of origin (Google Cloud, or AWS or Oracle Cloud outside the US), offers a fully on-premises option, and states SOC 2 Type II (report on request) and C5. KLAS rated Asimily first in its 2026 Healthcare IoT Security report at 96.6, and MemorialCare, Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare and Tufts Medicine are quoted as customers. No price is published. Ask how prioritization is validated and whether your device data trains the models.

AI Health Index verifiedSeptember 29, 2026
Compare Asimily with other vendors
Founded
2017
Headquarters
Sunnyvale, California, United States
Website
www.asimily.com
Categories
healthcare-cybersecurity
Indexed Products
Asimily platform (inventory, exposure management, segmentation orchestration), Asimily Edge appliance, ProSecure pre-purchase device risk, IoT Risk Simulator, FDA recall and advisory matching
Buyer Segments
Hospitals and health systems, Healthcare technology management and clinical engineering teams, Healthcare security operations teams, Manufacturing, energy and other industrial operators
Assessment

Capability Axes

An AI Health Index grade measures what a buyer can verify from public sources on the date shown. It is not a rating of how good the product is. A vendor can build an excellent system and grade low on an axis because it publishes nothing an outsider can check. How grades read

AI Capability
BB on AI CentralityThe model is the engine of a core module. The platform carries other value, but this capability does not exist without it.
Vendor Published

Models rank and classify inside a platform with other value. Asimily says it analyzes each vulnerability with patented AI and ML alongside its Asimily Labs researchers, cross-referencing EPSS, SBOMs, CVE lists, MITRE ATT&CK and NIST guidance against each device's configuration and network context, and it feeds device telemetry into behavioral modeling for classification and anomaly detection. Inventory, recall tracking, pre-purchase lookups, configuration control, patching and segmentation through existing NAC and firewalls would still stand without the models.

BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelThe oversight structure is described and one part is missing, commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Changes are simulated before they are applied, and the approval rule is not published. Segmentation Orchestration generates policies that are enforced through the hospital's own NAC and firewalls, and the company offers a risk simulator that shows the effect of a mitigation before it is taken; administrators can quarantine a device through the NAC. Nothing states which actions run automatically and which wait for approval, or what happens after a wrong quarantine.

BB on Model and Technology TransparencyThe approach or the suppliers are named without the version and update discipline behind them. Naming a supplier is the entry to this band both here and on Model Supply Chain Disclosure, which ask different questions of the same disclosure: who receives the data, and what produces the output.
Vendor Published

The approach is named without models or versions. Asimily describes a patented prioritization algorithm that cross-references EPSS, SBOMs, CVE lists, MITRE ATT&CK and NIST guidance against device context, behavioral modeling of device telemetry, and discovery that combines passive and active scanning with device profiles. No model, version, update practice or accuracy figure is published.

BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an in house build, a cleared model that cannot be quietly swapped, or a deployment where the transfer does not occur at all. Naming the model provider exits the band below into this one; the axis rises from here on the completeness of the party list and on the terms that govern data once it arrives.
Vendor Published

A short chain built in house, with hosts named and no subprocessor list. The prioritization algorithm and behavioral models are Asimily's own, with no outside model provider mentioned, and the product security page names Google Cloud as host, AWS and Oracle Cloud for non-US regions, and says PII and ePHI stay at the Edge. Vendors are risk assessed, but no subprocessor list is published.

CC on Clinical and Operational EvidenceNamed customers, or vendor reported percentages with no method, denominator or reference standard. Scale of use is recorded here and is not treated as evidence of benefit.
Vendor Published

Named customers and vendor figures without method. MemorialCare, Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare and Tufts Medicine are quoted, MemorialCare reporting 98 percent NIST compliance against a 71 percent average for 60 similar organizations; an unnamed 15-site hospital network reports 98 against 56 percent. The home page claims more than 10,000 high-risk vulnerabilities removed in three months. KLAS rated Asimily first in its 2026 Healthcare IoT Security report at 96.6, a satisfaction measure. None of these carries a method or date.

BB on AI Safety and PHI StewardshipCategorical commitments are published, such as no training on customer data, without the retention schedule behind them.
Vendor Published

Categorical commitments, with training use unstated. The product security page says neither PII nor ePHI is transmitted out of the on-site Edge appliance, data processed at the Edge is not written to disk, in-memory data is deleted after processing, cloud data stays in the country of origin, nothing is shared with third parties without customer authorization, and each customer runs on dedicated instances. Nothing says whether customer telemetry trains Asimily's models, and no retention period is published.

Regulatory and Compliance
BB on HIPAA and BAA PostureBusiness associate status is stated and supported by a substantive privacy document, with the agreement or its scope not fully published. For a vendor outside the United States, an equivalent regime documented to this depth grades here. A vendor whose product does not process protected health information grades here too when it says so plainly and explains the scope, with a service privacy document behind it: stating a position a buyer can rely on is the posture this axis grades, and the band above is closed to it because there is no agreement to publish.
Vendor Published

The product is scoped out of PHI in plain terms, without an agreement published. The product security page says PII and ePHI never leave the Edge appliance and that what reaches Asimily is technical data such as addresses and device classifications, with an on-premises deployment for organizations that want nothing in the cloud; the HIPAA page explains how the platform supports a covered entity's Security Rule work. The privacy policy covers the website only, and no business associate agreement or statement of status is published.

BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA recognized certification is named in the vendor own material without the artifact, or with a scope or renewal question the buyer has to raise. A recognized certification here is an audit of how the vendor operates security, such as SOC 2, HITRUST or ISO/IEC 27001. A certification has a scope and a clock, and both are part of this grade. A certification the vendor attaches to its data center, hosting facility or cloud provider, rather than presenting as its own, is the host's and does not count here.
Vendor Published

A recognized attestation is named, with the report on request. The product security page states SOC 2 Type II and C5 compliance, with the SOC 2 report available by email to security@asimily.com, and describes controls in detail: TLS 1.3, ChaCha20-Poly1305 from Edge to server, single-tenant cloud instances, geo-fencing, OWASP practice with static and dynamic analysis, Tenable scanning, internal and external penetration testing and verified builds. There is no trust center or ISO certificate.

BB on FDA and Regulatory StatusThe pathway is stated and in progress, or a clearance is named without the vintage and scope a buyer needs to match it to the product on offer.
Vendor Published

The company engages the device regime its customers live under, without stating its own position. The FDA page parses FDA and manufacturer recall notices into assignable work matched to devices, and discusses the 2023 medical device cybersecurity requirements; ProSecure draws on manufacturer MDS2 statements and SBOMs before purchase. The platform makes no device claim, but no page states Asimily's own regulatory position.

CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence is committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it. Most of the index sits here.
Vendor Published

Methods are named and nothing evaluates them. The prioritization algorithm is described as patented and grounded in MITRE ATT&CK, EPSS and in-house research, and changes can be simulated before they are made. No governance framework, accuracy figure for prioritization or classification, or statement on whether one customer's device data informs models used for others is published.

CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms exist that let someone challenge an output, such as audit trails, source traceability or review before commit, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the harmed party.
Vendor Published

The mechanism is visible and nothing measures or backs it. Risk is ranked by likelihood of exploitation in each device's configuration and network rather than by raw severity, and recommended mitigations come with the ranking. The home page says customers typically remove more than 10,000 high-risk vulnerabilities in their first three months, with no method or denominator. No error rate, warranty, indemnity or remediation commitment is published, and the ranking logic is not auditable by the customer.

Integration and Deployment
BB on EHR and Interoperability DepthNamed systems with read access or one directional writing, or standards support with named deployments behind it.
Vendor Published

It does not connect to the clinical record; its integrations are with the hospital's security and clinical engineering systems, named without production evidence. The integrations page describes two-way sync with CMMS and CMDB systems, automatic work orders for anomalies and vulnerabilities, NAC-driven segmentation, SIEM syslog export, vulnerability scanner, DHCP and IPAM, IAM and RTLS feeds, and shows Accruent, TRIMEDX, TruAsset, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike, Arista and Axonius. No named hospital is shown running a two-way CMMS sync.

AA on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyDeployment options, residency and tenant isolation are all documented, including where data rests and which processing crosses a border.
Vendor Published

Options, residency and isolation are documented, with one border question in the text. Asimily runs as cloud (Google Cloud in the US, AWS or Oracle Cloud for other regions) or fully on premises, with an on-site Edge appliance either way; each cloud customer gets its own server instances in its country of origin, with no multi-tenancy, and data access is geo-fenced. The same page says daily server snapshots are stored in the US multi-region, which a customer outside the United States should reconcile with the country-of-origin statement.

Commercial
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and the posture is discoverable: a buyer can establish how the product is sold and what drives the cost before contacting the vendor. Most of the index sits here.
Vendor Published

No price is published, and the sales route is discoverable. The platform is sold through demos and channel partners, with ProSecure pre-purchase lookups and the CMMS integrations as named capabilities. No unit of charge or tier is published.

AA on Setting and Specialty CoverageWhere the product is validated to operate is named and supported, settings and specialties both, whether the coverage is broad or deliberately narrow.
Vendor Published

Healthcare settings are named and supported by named sites. Asimily covers medical devices, IoT, building and OT systems and IT endpoints in hospitals and health systems, with hospital-specific functions (FDA recall matching, pre-purchase device risk lookups, device utilization), named customers MemorialCare, Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare and Tufts Medicine, and a KLAS evaluation of health system users; it also sells to manufacturing, energy, finance and other sectors.

Alternatives

Alternatives to Asimily

Vendors in the same categories as Asimily whose graded profiles look most alike, with a line on what each product does.

Similar is not the same, so check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

ORDR (formerly styled Ordr) sells connected device security for healthcare, manufacturing, finance, government and other sectors, built around turning device intelligence into enforced…

Censinet sells Censinet RiskOps, a risk management platform built for hospitals and health systems.

Armis sells Armis Centrix, a cyber exposure management platform covering IT, OT, IoT, medical devices, cloud and code.

Medication and compliance intelligence company whose two surveillance products watch hospital staff for insider risk: ControlCheck, formerly Bluesight for Controlled Substances, for drug…

Claroty sells cyber-physical systems security to hospitals, industry, commercial buildings and government, and its healthcare product is Claroty xDome for Healthcare, built on Medigate…

Finite State sells a product security platform to makers of connected devices, including medical device manufacturers, automotive, energy, industrial and government suppliers.

Ordered by how closely the graded profiles match across the fifteen axes, inside the same categories. See how each axis is graded in the methodology.

Comparisons

Compared With

Each comparison carries a written verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side. Pairs that cross a category boundary are grouped separately, and their verdicts state where the boundary sits rather than manufacturing a head to head.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

Entry Price Pricing Basis BAA Tier Implementation Source
Not published
Not published. Sold through demos and channel partners; cloud or on-premises deployment with an on-site Edge appliance. Not published. The product security page says PII and ePHI never leave the on-site Edge appliance; no business associate agreement or status is published. Not published. Vendor Published

No price, tier or unit of charge is published.

Three things to settle. The licensing unit, since per device, per site and per bed pricing behave very differently across a fleet of thousands of connected medical devices. Whether ProSecure pre-purchase lookups, the IoT Risk Simulator, packet capture and the CMMS integrations are in the base license. And the enforcement cost, because segmentation runs through the hospital's own NAC and firewalls, so the platform license is not the whole spend.