TheraPulse

Transcription and note generation are the entire product, with a secondary research lookup tool alongside. No services layer or adjacent business underneath.

Conventional draft and review, with a genuinely useful alternative path. Clinicians who prefer not to record can use a dictation route where they speak their own reflections and key points after the session and the system structures those into a note, so the clinical content originates with the clinician rather than from captured conversation. Offering a non recording path at all is uncommon and it materially changes both the consent and the accuracy question. Held at B because no acceptance rate, edit burden figure or confidence threshold is published.

No accuracy figure, model card, named models or evaluation methodology located. The performance claims are speed and time saved rather than correctness: notes in around 60 seconds and up to two hours saved daily.

No study, controlled evaluation, accuracy benchmark, third party rating, named customer or documented deployment located. Claims are vendor generated and the reviews available are affiliate style write ups rather than assessments.

The strongest deletion commitment located in the behavioral segment, on the most sensitive audio in this index. TheraPulse states that recordings are used only for processing and are DELETED IMMEDIATELY AFTER TRANSCRIPTION, alongside AES 256 encryption and a claim that session data is anonymised. Immediate deletion of psychotherapy audio removes an entire category of exposure rather than managing it. Three things hold it at B rather than A. Anonymised is doing unclear work, since therapy notes are inherently identifying. The commitment covers RECORDINGS and says nothing about transcripts or generated notes. And no statement was located on whether either is used to train models, which is the commitment that earns Mentalyc an A in this same segment.

HIPAA compliance stated consistently. Business associate agreement terms are not published for inspection, and the product is self serve so a clinician can begin before any agreement conversation.

Not assessed. AES 256 encryption is a cipher rather than an attestation, and the accompanying phrase describing it as the same encryption banks use belongs with the other non attestation language this index tracks. No named or dated certification and no trust centre located.

Not a regulated medical device and none claimed or required for documentation.

Consent is addressed directly, which almost no vendor in this index does, and it should be read with both hands. On the credit side, TheraPulse states that recording is OPTIONAL and only done with CONSENT, and it backs that with a real non recording workflow rather than leaving refusal as a dead end. On the other side, its guidance coaches clinicians on how to FRAME the request, recommending the conversation be built around client benefits such as receiving session summaries. Scripting a consent conversation to improve acceptance deserves scrutiny anywhere, and more so in psychotherapy, where the power differential is pronounced and the material is the most protected category of clinical data. Separately, no fairness statement, subgroup analysis or accent and dialect disclosure was located.

Compatibility rather than integration. The vendor describes the product as working with most browser based electronic record and telehealth platforms, which in practice means the note is produced alongside the record system and moved by the clinician rather than written into it. For a solo therapist that is usually sufficient and it preserves a firm human gate, but no named integration, write back mechanism or structured field population was located.

Not assessed. Cloud delivered, and while the immediate deletion of recordings reduces what residency would protect, no hosting region, storage location for notes or sub processor detail was located.

Published and sensibly structured, tiered by SESSION VOLUME rather than by seat: reported at roughly 29 US dollars a month for 30 sessions, 49 for 50 and 99 for 100, with a fourth tier above. Volume pricing suits part time and building practices, and it is the right shape for a market where caseloads vary widely. Held at B because the figures were located through a third party review dated late 2024 rather than confirmed on the vendor's own pricing page in this pass, so they may be stale.

Behavioral health across a wide range of clinician types, naming therapists, psychologists, counsellors, clinical social workers, psychiatrists, marriage counsellors and group therapists, with speech pathology also referenced. Note formats cover SOAP, DAP and BIRP. Its multi voice detection extends coverage to couples, family and group sessions, which is a harder documentation problem than individual therapy and which most scribes do not attempt. Narrower than JotPsych, which adds psychiatric medication management depth, but broader than the therapy only tools on session type.