AI Health Index
Healthcare Cybersecurity
M

Medcurity

Medcurity combines HIPAA security risk analysis software with access to compliance specialists. Teams answer questions about their systems and safeguards, organize supporting evidence and turn findings into remediation tasks with owners and deadlines. Conversational assistance helps generate assessment narratives, while policy templates, training and vendor agreement management support the wider compliance program.

Small practices can complete assessments themselves and request specialist help. Guided engagements add expert review, physical safeguard assessments and a named advisor. Organizations with several facilities can keep site details within a shared assessment structure. The product focuses on managing organizational safeguards and audit preparation, with application terms prohibiting entry of PHI.

AI Health Index verifiedOctober 14, 2026
Compare Medcurity with other vendors
Founded
2018
Headquarters
Spokane, Washington, United States
Website
medcurity.com/
Categories
healthcare-cybersecurity
Indexed Products
Security Risk Analysis, Small Practice SRA, Vendor Risk Management, HIPAA Training
Buyer Segments
Community health centers, Rural hospitals, Medical practices, Healthcare compliance teams
Assessment

Capability Axes

An AI Health Index grade measures what a buyer can verify from public sources on the date shown. It is not a rating of how good the product is. A vendor can build an excellent system and grade low on an axis because it publishes nothing an outsider can check. How grades read

AI Capability
AI Centrality
CC on AI CentralityArtificial intelligence is a feature layer on a product whose value stands without it. A learned component is a model whose parameters are estimated from data: machine learning, or a statistical model fitted to population data, including one then updated on the patient measurements. A fixed formula, a rule set, or a feedback controller that adjusts a dosing factor from the patient own readings is not one, however patient specific its output and whatever the vendor calls the adjustment.
Vendor Published

Conversational intake and narrative generation add AI assistance to security risk analysis. Policy libraries, remediation assignments, training and specialist support retain value independently, making the learned capability a feature of a broader compliance platform.

Autonomy and Oversight Model
BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelThe oversight structure is described and one part is missing, commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Every guided assessment receives HIPAA specialist review before finalization, while small practices can request a second look. Automated findings remain subject to staff decisions, but confidence thresholds and mandatory escalation rules for the AI feature are unspecified.

Model and Technology Transparency
CC on Model and Technology TransparencyThe architecture is described in general terms with nothing identified. Proprietary is asserted rather than explained.
Vendor Published

The workflow combines adaptive decision trees, risk calculations and conversational document generation. The learned model behind generated language, its training data and release evaluation process are unspecified, limiting visibility into the AI component.

Model Supply Chain Disclosure
CC on Model Supply Chain DisclosureThe architecture is described and no model provider is named. Naming a hosting provider alone does not lift a record out of this band. Record the host in the note, because it matters for residency and breach scope, and grade on the model layer, which is the question this axis is named for.
Vendor Published

The platform combines conversational assistance, assessment workflows and automated evidence collection. No core model provider is identified. Microsoft Clarity and Google Analytics support website measurement, which does not identify the assessment model supply chain.

Clinical and Operational Evidence
CC on Clinical and Operational EvidenceNamed customers, or vendor reported percentages with no method, denominator or reference standard. Scale of use is recorded here and is not treated as evidence of benefit.
Vendor Published

Named customers include Chiricahua Community Health Centers, NEW Health and Harbor Regional Health. Their testimonials describe support and assessment workflows, but do not establish measured improvements with dated comparisons or a reproducible evaluation method.

AI Safety and PHI Stewardship
CC on AI Safety and PHI StewardshipGeneral assurances of privacy and security that do not answer the questions artificial intelligence raises: what is retained, what reaches a model, and what happens to it there.
Vendor Published

Service data can be deleted or anonymized when its business purpose ends, with backup exceptions. Assessment content retention, model training use and an AI incident response process remain unspecified. Website analytics have separate data use terms.

Regulatory and Compliance
HIPAA and BAA Posture
BB on HIPAA and BAA PostureBusiness associate status is stated and supported by a substantive privacy document, with the agreement or its scope not fully published. For a vendor outside the United States, an equivalent regime documented to this depth grades here. A vendor whose product does not process protected health information grades here too when it says so plainly and explains the scope, with a service privacy document behind it: stating a position a buyer can rely on is the posture this axis grades, and the band above is closed to it because there is no agreement to publish.
Vendor Published

Application terms prohibit entering PHI, while the service privacy policy covers account and usage information. The compliance workflow evaluates safeguards and organizational practices; managing customer BAAs does not itself establish a PHI processing agreement with Medcurity.

Security Certifications and Trust Center
DD on Security Certifications and Trust CenterControls are asserted with nothing independent behind them, or nothing is published. Read the note before concluding anything: this is the grade most often corrected on a second pass, because assurance material frequently sits on a parent domain or inside an old announcement rather than on the product pages.
Vendor Published

Network assessments and penetration testing are services for customers. They do not establish an independent assessment of Medcurity itself. A recognized vendor security attestation or testing cadence for its platform remains unspecified.

FDA and Regulatory Status
CC on FDA and Regulatory StatusNo device claim is made and the product is scoped accordingly. Most administrative and operational products sit here and are not penalized for it, because this axis grades the appropriateness of the positioning rather than possession of a clearance.
Vendor Published

The platform organizes security risk assessments, policy templates, training and remediation work for healthcare organizations. Its intended function is administrative compliance support, without diagnostic, treatment selection or medical device positioning.

AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
DD on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureNothing published on how model behavior is governed or tested. Multilingual operation with no subgroup performance sits here when the vendor markets recognition quality as a strength, because a caller the system failed to understand leaves no complaint and no record.
Vendor Published

Risk assessment follows HIPAA safeguards and NIST methods, but those frameworks address customer security programs. Product specific model testing, subgroup results and a process for governing changes to AI behavior remain unspecified.

AI Liability and Recourse
BB on AI Liability and RecourseA published falsifiable commitment, or a real correction route the affected person can exercise against the vendor. A published error rate with its method and denominator grades here. A statutory right that runs to the covered entity rather than to the vendor does not reach this band on its own: every other route here asks something of the vendor, and being located in a particular jurisdiction is not conduct.
Vendor Published

Users can request account information correction directly from Medcurity through its support channel. Expert assessment review offers another practical checkpoint, while a contractual remedy for erroneous AI findings or missed compliance gaps remains unspecified.

Integration and Deployment
EHR and Interoperability Depth
CC on EHR and Interoperability DepthIntegration is claimed through standards or a middleware layer with no system named and nothing to verify.
Vendor Published

Automated evidence collection can connect to existing security tools and IT infrastructure. Named connectors, interface specifications and production EHR data exchange are unspecified, so the integration scope remains general compliance infrastructure.

Deployment Model and Data Residency
BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyOptions and residency are stated with isolation or the processing path left open.
Vendor Published

The compliance platform runs in the cloud with US servers. Service terms allow additional international processing, while customer selectable regions, tenant isolation and the complete path of assessment data remain unspecified.

Commercial
Commercial Transparency
DD on Commercial TransparencyNothing a buyer can establish before a sales conversation. A published pricing claim contradicted by evidence also grades here.
Vendor Published

The small practice package starts at $499 per year for up to 20 full time employees. A conflicting flat $499 claim covers any provider and site count, leaving larger organizations without a consistent price basis.

Setting and Specialty Coverage
BB on Setting and Specialty CoverageCoverage is named with validation behind part of it.
Vendor Published

Customer examples span community health centers, rural providers, pediatrics and hospice. These establish use across several care settings, while broader medical, dental and behavioral health coverage has less specific validation behind it.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

Entry Price Pricing Basis BAA Tier Implementation Source
From $499/year
$499 baseline
 Annual Small Practice SRA for up to 20 full time employees; larger scope priced separately. PHI entry prohibited by application terms. Guided review and onsite assessment options; additional fees unspecified. Vendor Published

Small practice pricing scales with organization size, while a separate flat $499 claim covers any site and provider count. The conflicting scope prevents a dependable larger organization estimate.