Ambience Healthcare
AI documentation suite pairing an ambient scribe with point of care automation modules, positioned as an operating system rather than a note taker. AutoScribe produces a fully structured note in about twenty seconds, classifying statements into documentation sections with specialty tuned models covering more than 200 specialties including emergency and hospital medicine. The surrounding suite is what distinguishes it: AutoCDI validates notes against ICD-10 and CPT requirements at the point of care with audit trails for revenue cycle teams, AutoAVS generates patient friendly after visit summaries in the patient's language, AutoRefer drafts referral letters, and AutoPrep reads prior charts to prepare a visit agenda. A Chart Awareness platform launched February 2026 grounds notes in the full longitudinal record including prior notes, labs, imaging, medications, and problem lists. Native API integrations with Epic, Oracle Health, and athenahealth. Cleveland Clinic selected Ambience over four rival scribes for a five year deployment; also reported at UCSF, Memorial Hermann, John Muir Health, The Oncology Institute, and GI Alliance. Support is English first, which points the product at large health systems rather than independent practices.
Capability Axes
Every module in the suite is model driven, from ambient note generation through coding validation, after visit summary generation, referral drafting, and pre visit chart preparation. There is no non AI version of the product.
AutoCDI produces audit trails for revenue cycle teams at the point of care, and the clinician reviews and signs every note, so human sign off is structural. Held back from A because the platform does not publish a per statement provenance mechanism comparable to source audio linkage, which matters more here than for a scribe alone since the suite also generates coding assertions and patient facing summaries.
Strong procurement signal rather than published outcomes: Cleveland Clinic selected Ambience over four rival scribes following a competitive evaluation and committed to a five year deployment, with additional named sites at UCSF, Memorial Hermann, John Muir Health, The Oncology Institute, and GI Alliance. A competitive bake off win at that institution is meaningful third party validation. Held back from A because no peer reviewed outcome study was retrieved, which is the standard set by others in this category.
Native API integrations across Epic, Oracle Health, and athenahealth, and the Chart Awareness platform launched February 2026 grounds generated notes in the full longitudinal record including prior notes, labs, imaging, medications, and problem lists. Reading the chart rather than only the conversation is a materially deeper integration posture than transcript only scribes.
No public pricing. Contact the vendor. Annual enterprise contracts priced per clinical full time equivalent with no self serve path. Third party estimates are recorded in the pricing record and labeled as estimates.
Specialty tuned models across more than 200 specialties including emergency and hospital medicine, which is the broadest specialty claim in this category. The company is also candid that support is English first, an explicit and useful limitation.
Announced Deployments
Publicly announced health system deployments and partnerships. This is a record of announcements, not an assessment of deployment success or scale.
Pricing
Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.
| Entry Price | Pricing Basis | BAA Tier | Implementation | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Estimated $2,800 to $3,200 per provider per year
$2,800 baseline
|
Annual enterprise contracts priced per clinical full time equivalent | — | — | Third Party Estimated |
ESTIMATED. The vendor publishes no pricing and offers no self serve path. Third party analyses put base AutoScribe near $2,800 to $3,200 per provider per year, with the full module suite reaching $4,000 to $5,000 or more. Neither figure is confirmed by the vendor. The spread between base and suite pricing is the material procurement question, since the modules beyond AutoScribe are what differentiate the product. Treat as directional only.