M

mdhub pricing

Nothing published on cost, against returns published in detail, under a purchase that becomes hard to reverse at a specific and identifiable moment.

mdhub full profile mdhub alternatives

Pricing terms

How mdhub pricing works

Pricing model: Not published. No rate card, no stated unit of charge, and no indication of whether pricing runs per clinician, per agent, per session or per site. Three AI workers are described as operating independently or together, which implies the agents can be licensed separately, and nothing states whether the underlying platform, the EHR, CRM and revenue cycle modules, carries its own charge or arrives with them. No term, minimum commitment, volume banding or renewal escalator is disclosed. Sales run through a demo booking.
Implementation: Not disclosed. Implementation is managed end to end by the vendor and presented as included rather than priced: a single agent live within days, the full platform in about four weeks covering configuration, integration, data migration and training, with the setup team configuring the admissions agent to the clinic's own workflows and scripts. No fee position, no data migration charge and no statement of what happens if migration runs long is published. Migration of the clinical record is the point at which the commitment stops being reversible, and its cost and scope are not published.
Business associate agreement: Published in full and available to every customer. The agreement sits on the site, dated 25 June 2025, so it can be read before contracting rather than after, and it is not reserved for enterprise accounts. It covers breach notification without unreasonable delay, defines and carves out unsuccessful security incidents by deemed notice, and commits mdhub to return or destroy protected health information at termination where feasible. Two provisions stand out: the agreement permits mdhub to create de identified information from protected health information under the regulatory de identification standard and states that mdhub owns all such de identified data, and it contains no subcontractor flow down clause binding subcontractors who handle protected health information to the same restrictions. Separately, the company's published answer on whether the platform handles substance use disorder records under the federal confidentiality regime refers practices to their own compliance team rather than describing segmentation.

No rate card, basis, term, minimum or volume banding is disclosed, and nothing states whether pricing runs per clinician, per agent, per session or per site. Sales are demo led. Implementation is managed by the vendor, with a single agent live within days and the full platform in about four weeks including configuration, integration, data migration and training.

The returns are specific: around 30 percent more patients scheduled, denials cut by 70 percent, more than two hours saved per clinician daily, operational costs down by up to half. A buyer is given a precise numerator and no denominator, and cannot weigh any of it until a price sits beside it.

The structural point matters more than the missing figure. mdhub is a full platform including the system of record, so at full adoption it is not a tool the clinic uses but the system the clinic runs on, and pricing power at renewal is different when leaving means migrating the clinical record. The company offers a mitigation plainly: the three agents operate independently or together, so a clinic can adopt one alongside its existing record system and keep early commitment reversible. The commitment becomes hard at the migration of clinical records, not before.

The pricing basis and whether it differs per agent, renewal and escalator terms, and the data return format and timetable at exit are not published.

Compared on price

mdhub pricing against its alternatives

Published prices for mdhub and the products closest to it. Each figure is as the vendor publishes it, in its own currency and billing unit.

All mdhub alternatives →

M
mdhubNot published. Sold through a demo. Three agents priced separately or together, basis undisclosed
E
Eleos HealthNo published price
N
Nextvisit AI$49 per month (Nextvisit Go, non prescribing providers, 100 notes), $199 per month (Provider+, prescribers, unlimited notes), Enterprise quoted
V
Videra HealthNo published price
P
PMHScribe$79 a month
N
Nudge AIFree ($0, 5 notes, no card), Pro $99 per month, Enterprise quoted
P
PIMSYNo published price
C
Clinically AIFree account; paid plans from $20 a month
L
LyssnNo published price

Questions

mdhub pricing, answered

How much does mdhub cost?

mdhub does not publish a price. Nothing published on cost, against returns published in detail, under a purchase that becomes hard to reverse at a specific and identifiable moment. Sales are demo led.

Does mdhub charge an implementation fee?

Not disclosed. Implementation is managed end to end by the vendor and presented as included rather than priced: a single agent live within days, the full platform in about four weeks covering configuration, integration, data migration and training, with the setup team configuring the admissions agent to the clinic's own workflows and scripts. No fee position, no data migration charge and no statement of what happens if migration runs long is published. Migration of the clinical record is the point at which the commitment stops being reversible, and its cost and scope are not published.

Does mdhub offer a business associate agreement?

Published in full and available to every customer. The agreement sits on the site, dated 25 June 2025, so it can be read before contracting rather than after, and it is not reserved for enterprise accounts. It covers breach notification without unreasonable delay, defines and carves out unsuccessful security incidents by deemed notice, and commits mdhub to return or destroy protected health information at termination where feasible. Two provisions stand out: the agreement permits mdhub to create de identified information from protected health information under the regulatory de identification standard and states that mdhub owns all such de identified data, and it contains no subcontractor flow down clause binding subcontractors who handle protected health information to the same restrictions. Separately, the company's published answer on whether the platform handles substance use disorder records under the federal confidentiality regime refers practices to their own compliance team rather than describing segmentation.