Nabla vs Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent (2026)

AI Health Index verifiedAugust 4, 2026
Verdict

An Oracle Health site can run either, because Nabla integrates with Oracle Health alongside Epic, athenahealth, NextGen, Greenway and Arya. The Oracle agent lives inside the record. It drafts notes and, since February 2026, laboratory, imaging, prescription and follow up orders for the physician to approve, and since August 2026 it suggests professional fee charge codes and takes dictation. Nabla is a separate scribe with dictation and E/M coding suggestions, an independent randomized trial, a published price and a data lifecycle described down to backup expiry. Choose the agent if native order drafting inside Oracle Health is the capability you are buying and you accept an unpublished error profile. Choose Nabla if you want documented efficiency and data terms you can read before signing.

The case for Nabla
  • Nabla cut time in notes by 9.5 percent against usual care in a UCLA Health randomized trial published in NEJM AI, the only arm to meet the primary endpoint.
  • Nabla publishes its data lifecycle, with audio not stored by default, notes deleted after 14 days unless shortened, backups expiring seven days later, and no training on customer data.
  • The same scribe runs on Epic, athenahealth, NextGen, Greenway and Arya, so the program survives a record system change.
The case for Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent
  • The agent drafts prescriptions, laboratory tests, imaging and follow up appointments from the conversation, completes them from the patient's history and the physician's favorites, and leaves them for the physician to approve.
  • There is no separate product to deploy. Notes, orders, charge codes and dictation run natively in Oracle Health with no launch step or note transfer.
  • It is already inside the contract, the security review and the support relationship, which for a constrained Oracle Health IT team can count for more than a second vendor.

This comparison is published by AI Health Index, an independent research platform that compares healthcare AI vendors objectively. Nabla and Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent are each graded against the same capability taxonomy, from each vendor's own public materials and the regulatory record, under the AI Health Index verification standard. No vendor pays for placement, and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

At a Glance

Plain facts

Fact Nabla Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent
Primary category Ambient Scribes Ambient Scribes
Founded 2018 1977
Headquarters Paris, France Austin, Texas, United States
Website nabla.com oracle.com
Attribute Matrix

Side by Side

Select any grade to read the note behind it.

Axis
N
Nabla
O
Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent
AI Centrality
Autonomy and Oversight Model
Model and Technology Transparency
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
Clinical and Operational Evidence
AI Safety and PHI Stewardship
HIPAA and BAA Posture
Security Certifications and Trust Center
FDA and Regulatory Status
AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
AI Liability and Recourse
EHR and Interoperability Depth
Deployment Model and Data Residency
Commercial Transparency
Setting and Specialty Coverage
Change Log

Product updates

The latest logged changes from each vendor, newest first, each linked to its source.

Nabla

  • EHR / interoperability

    Nabla released the first beta of @nabla/connect-sdk, a browser SDK for EHR and partner pages that embed the Nabla Connect encounter frame.

    Source
  • Product / capability

    Nabla's Connect API now accepts Dutch for the Netherlands and for Belgium as speech languages when partners provision providers, a change applied to all earlier API versions.

    Source
  • Product / capability

    Nabla released version 2026-08-25 of its Core API.

    Source
All 4 Nabla updates →

Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent

  • Product / capability

    Oracle made its Clinical AI Agent available to inpatient nurses in the US.

    Source
  • Product / capability

    Oracle Health expanded its Clinical AI Agent with new capabilities for automated professional fee coding, AI-powered chart review, and clinician-controlled dictation.

    Source
All 2 Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent updates →
Citable Summaries

Each vendor in one paragraph

Written to be quoted whole. Each paragraph opens the AI Health Index profile of the vendor: what the product is, who buys it and what it does.

Nabla

Nabla sells an ambient AI assistant that listens to the visit and drafts a structured clinical note, together with dictation and E/M coding suggestions, to health systems, medical groups and individual clinicians. The company reports more than 85,000 clinicians across more than 130 health organizations and more than 20 million patient encounters a year.

Source: AI Health Index, August 2026

Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent

Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent is the ambient documentation and assistant layer built into the Oracle Health electronic health record, the platform Oracle acquired with Cerner, and it is now marketed as part of Oracle Health AI Agents. It listens to the visit and drafts the note.

Source: AI Health Index, August 2026

FAQ

Questions buyers ask

How do Nabla and Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent work with the EHR?

Nabla pulls patient history and visit context from the EHR, exports structured notes into EHR templates, and places vital signs, diagnoses and patient instructions into charts, flowsheets and clinical fields. The systems named are Epic, athenahealth, Oracle Health, NextGen, Greenway and Arya.

For an Oracle site the integration is as close as it gets; for anyone else it is not an option. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified August 4, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

How are Nabla and Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent priced and sold?

An individual clinician can sign up online, use the product free for 30 days, and then pay $119 a month, the rate Nabla's help center states. Organizations buying for many clinicians go through Nabla's team, and group rates are quoted on request, with no group price, volume tier or enterprise unit listed.

Oracle sells it within the Oracle Health record system relationship, so its cost sits inside an enterprise EHR contract and cannot be separated or compared with per clinician scribe pricing from outside. Oracle's product page adds that the pricing of the features it describes may change at Oracle's sole discretion. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified August 4, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

How do Nabla and Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent handle patient data?

Audio is not stored by default, notes are kept for 14 days from the moment an encounter is created, and a customer can shorten that window, down to a few hours according to Nabla's French compliance page. On expiry the data leaves the application and remains only in backups, which expire seven days later.

In Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent's case, the output now includes orders and charge codes, which are derived clinical data with their own retention and reuse questions. Nothing published describes safety engineering on the model: no guardrails, no hallucination controls and no process for handling a safety event. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified August 4, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

Which settings and specialties do Nabla and Oracle Health Clinical AI Agent cover?

For Nabla, customers range from individual practices to large health systems, and emergency and inpatient clinicians can document on mobile inside Epic. Nabla supports more than 35 languages, from English, Spanish and French to several Arabic dialects, Hindi, Mandarin and Haitian Creole.

Oracle's page describes clinical support across inpatient, outpatient and emergency settings and a nursing agent for capturing charting details by voice, while several administrative agents are marked as planned rather than shipped. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified August 4, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

Keep Comparing

Related comparisons

Other published head to head assessments involving these vendors or their closest peers.

Disclosure

The UCLA trial behind Nabla's result ran in outpatient care at a single academic health system, limited to English language visits. Oracle publishes no accuracy figure for notes, orders or codes, no confidence signal for drafted orders and no agent scoped security or business associate documentation, and its product page says the AI features may change and may not be incorporated into any contract.

An earlier version of this comparison said Nabla's free tier lacked a business associate agreement; Nabla's terms make accepting its published agreement a condition of use for any customer subject to HIPAA. That statement was corrected on 13 September 2026. The Oracle agent is sold inside the Oracle Health relationship with no standalone price.