CertifyOS vs Verifiable (2026)
Two NCQA certified verification organisations with opposite architectures, and your existing stack decides it. CertifyOS is headless infrastructure: an API first CVO with RESTful endpoints and real time webhooks, graded A on interoperability, that embeds into any system because it exposes an interface rather than an application. Verifiable makes the opposite bet, running natively inside the customer's own Salesforce instance so credentialing sits alongside CRM data and in infrastructure the customer already governs, a strong fit for Salesforce organisations and a poor one for everyone else. Both keep AI light, graded C, since the moat is source coverage and certification. If your failure mode is embedding credentialing into your own product or a non Salesforce stack, start with CertifyOS. If your organisation already runs on Salesforce and you want credentialing native to it, start with Verifiable.
- Interoperability as an open API, graded A: RESTful endpoints and real time webhooks push events into any system, with named connectivity to CAQH, PECOS, and NPPES, built to embed anywhere rather than into one platform, where Verifiable is native to Salesforce and grades B.
- Breadth of the provider data lifecycle behind the API: credentialing, licensing, enrollment, roster reconciliation, and sanctions monitoring across more than 600 primary sources, NCQA certified for all eleven verification services.
- Stack independence: because it is headless infrastructure, CertifyOS fits organisations regardless of which CRM or system of record they run.
- A native fit for Salesforce organisations: credentialing runs inside the customer's own Salesforce instance, alongside existing CRM data and in infrastructure the customer already governs, which is a meaningful data residency answer.
- Flexible delivery: license the software to run credentialing in house, use the NCQA certified verification services, or combine them, with a reported throughput upwards of 225 packets per specialist per month.
- For a Salesforce shop, one less system to integrate, since credentialing lives where the rest of operations already do.
This comparison is published by AI Health Index, an independent research platform that compares healthcare AI vendors objectively. CertifyOS and Verifiable are each graded against the same capability taxonomy, from each vendor's own public materials and the regulatory record, under the AI Health Index verification standard. No vendor pays for placement, and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Plain facts
| Fact | CertifyOS | Verifiable |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Healthcare Administrative Automation | Healthcare Administrative Automation |
| Founded | 2020 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, New York, United States | Austin, Texas, United States |
| Website | certifyos.com | verifiable.com |
Side by Side
Each record in one paragraph
Written to be quoted whole. Each paragraph states what the AI Health Index verified about the vendor, with the caveats attached. Generated from this pair’s live capability grades, so it moves when a grade moves.
The AI Health Index awards CertifyOS its top capability grade on EHR and Interoperability Depth. Set against Verifiable, CertifyOS grades higher on Security Certifications and Trust Center and EHR and Interoperability Depth. Grades reflect evidence the AI Health Index could verify at the last review, so a low grade records disclosure the vendor has not published rather than a capability it has been shown to lack.
Source: AI Health Index, July 2026
The AI Health Index records no top capability grade for Verifiable on any axis it scores. Set against CertifyOS, Verifiable grades higher on FDA and Regulatory Status. Grades reflect evidence the AI Health Index could verify at the last review, so a low grade records disclosure the vendor has not published rather than a capability it has been shown to lack.
Source: AI Health Index, July 2026
Questions buyers ask
Should we choose CertifyOS or Verifiable?
On the axes where the AI Health Index separates them, CertifyOS grades higher on Security Certifications and Trust Center and EHR and Interoperability Depth, and Verifiable grades higher on FDA and Regulatory Status. CertifyOS leads on the greater share of scored axes, but the split means the decision turns on which constraint is binding rather than on an overall winner.
Where do CertifyOS and Verifiable differ most?
The widest separation the AI Health Index records between CertifyOS and Verifiable is on Security Certifications and Trust Center, where CertifyOS grades B and Verifiable grades C. That axis sits in the Regulatory and Compliance group, so it should carry the most weight for a buyer whose binding constraint is where regulatory exposure sits and who carries it.
Where do CertifyOS and Verifiable grade the same?
The AI Health Index grades CertifyOS and Verifiable the same on several axes, including AI Centrality, Autonomy and Oversight Model and Model and Technology Transparency. Neither holds an advantage the index can evidence on those axes, so they should not carry weight in a selection between these two.
Related comparisons
Other published head to head assessments involving these vendors or their closest peers. The full set for this category is on the Healthcare Administrative Automation page.
Both are NCQA certified CVOs and both grade C on AI centrality, so this is purely an architecture choice. CertifyOS is headless, embeddable infrastructure, graded A on interoperability, that fits any stack because it exposes an API rather than an application. Verifiable is the opposite bet, graded B on interoperability, native to one platform, which is a strong fit for Salesforce organisations and a poor one for everyone else, the single practical gating question.
Neither publishes model detail or accuracy. Evidence is vendor reported on both, C on each, though of different kinds: CertifyOS cites speed and cost percentages, Verifiable cites a concrete 225 packets per specialist figure. Neither publishes pricing, though both disclose that in house and outsourced models exist. The decision is whether you want credentialing exposed as an API to build on, or embedded natively in Salesforce.