CertifyOS vs Verifiable
Two NCQA certified verification organisations with opposite architectures, and your existing stack decides it. CertifyOS is headless infrastructure: an API first CVO with RESTful endpoints and real time webhooks, graded A on interoperability, that embeds into any system because it exposes an interface rather than an application. Verifiable makes the opposite bet, running natively inside the customer's own Salesforce instance so credentialing sits alongside CRM data and in infrastructure the customer already governs, a strong fit for Salesforce organisations and a poor one for everyone else. Both keep AI light, graded C, since the moat is source coverage and certification. If your failure mode is embedding credentialing into your own product or a non Salesforce stack, start with CertifyOS. If your organisation already runs on Salesforce and you want credentialing native to it, start with Verifiable.
- Interoperability as an open API, graded A: RESTful endpoints and real time webhooks push events into any system, with named connectivity to CAQH, PECOS, and NPPES, built to embed anywhere rather than into one platform, where Verifiable is native to Salesforce and grades B.
- Breadth of the provider data lifecycle behind the API: credentialing, licensing, enrollment, roster reconciliation, and sanctions monitoring across more than 600 primary sources, NCQA certified for all eleven verification services.
- Stack independence: because it is headless infrastructure, CertifyOS fits organisations regardless of which CRM or system of record they run.
- A native fit for Salesforce organisations: credentialing runs inside the customer's own Salesforce instance, alongside existing CRM data and in infrastructure the customer already governs, which is a meaningful data residency answer.
- Flexible delivery: license the software to run credentialing in house, use the NCQA certified verification services, or combine them, with a reported throughput upwards of 225 packets per specialist per month.
- For a Salesforce shop, one less system to integrate, since credentialing lives where the rest of operations already do.
Side-by-Side
| Axis | C CertifyOS |
V Verifiable |
|---|---|---|
| AI Centrality | ||
| Autonomy and Oversight Model | ||
| Model and Technology Transparency | ||
| Clinical and Operational Evidence | ||
| AI Safety and PHI Stewardship | ||
| HIPAA and BAA Posture | ||
| Security Certifications and Trust Center | ||
| FDA and Regulatory Status | ||
| AI Governance and Bias Disclosure | ||
| EHR and Interoperability Depth | ||
| Deployment Model and Data Residency | ||
| Commercial Transparency | ||
| Setting and Specialty Coverage |
Both are NCQA certified CVOs and both grade C on AI centrality, so this is purely an architecture choice. CertifyOS is headless, embeddable infrastructure, graded A on interoperability, that fits any stack because it exposes an API rather than an application. Verifiable is the opposite bet, graded B on interoperability, native to one platform, which is a strong fit for Salesforce organisations and a poor one for everyone else, the single practical gating question. Neither publishes model detail or accuracy. Evidence is vendor reported on both, C on each, though of different kinds: CertifyOS cites speed and cost percentages, Verifiable cites a concrete 225 packets per specialist figure. Neither publishes pricing, though both disclose that in house and outsourced models exist. The decision is whether you want credentialing exposed as an API to build on, or embedded natively in Salesforce.