Blueprint vs Eleos Health (2026)

AI Health Index verifiedSeptember 20, 2026
Verdict

Bottom up against top down. Blueprint is bought by a therapist or a small practice, with published prices, a free tier on its own record system and an assistant priced by session. Eleos is sold to a behavioral health organization through a demo and a contract, and publishes no price. The evidence positions are the sharpest difference. Eleos publishes a randomized trial in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, run at one clinic with 47 adults, alongside further papers with academic collaborators, and it holds ISO/IEC 42001 certification for its AI management system after an audit by an accredited body. Blueprint publishes adoption instead, more than seventy thousand clinicians, which tells a buyer the product is used rather than that it works. Both publish a business associate agreement and both state that client data is not used to train models. Eleos deletes session audio within one to two minutes. Blueprint deletes recorded audio immediately after the session.

The case for Blueprint
  • You are buying for yourself or a handful of clinicians, and you want the cost before the conversation. The assistant is priced by session and the core tools of its own record system are free.
  • It runs over what you already use through a browser extension, so nothing migrates, and its own record system stays available if you want it later.
  • The work reaches past the note into session prep, suggested interventions from its clinical library and measurement based care.
The case for Eleos Health
  • You are an organization with supervisors and compliance staff, covering substance use disorder treatment and field based care as well as clinic sessions.
  • Published research and an accredited certification of its AI management system give a diligence team material to read, which is rare in this category.
  • Deployment, residency and data isolation are documented, and session audio is deleted within one to two minutes of the session ending.

This comparison is published by AI Health Index, an independent research platform that compares healthcare AI vendors objectively. Blueprint and Eleos Health are each graded against the same capability taxonomy, from each vendor's own public materials and the regulatory record, under the AI Health Index verification standard. No vendor pays for placement, and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded

At a Glance

Plain facts

Fact Blueprint Eleos Health
Primary category Behavioral Health AI Behavioral Health AI
Founded 2018 2019
Headquarters Chicago, Illinois, United States Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
Website blueprint.ai eleos.health
Attribute Matrix

Side by Side

Select any grade to read the note behind it.

Axis
B
Blueprint
E
Eleos Health
AI Centrality
Autonomy and Oversight Model
Model and Technology Transparency
Model Supply Chain Disclosure
Clinical and Operational Evidence
AI Safety and PHI Stewardship
HIPAA and BAA Posture
Security Certifications and Trust Center
FDA and Regulatory Status
AI Governance and Bias Disclosure
AI Liability and Recourse
EHR and Interoperability Depth
Deployment Model and Data Residency
Commercial Transparency
Setting and Specialty Coverage
Citable Summaries

Each vendor in one paragraph

Written to be quoted whole. Each paragraph opens the AI Health Index profile of the vendor: what the product is, who buys it and what it does.

Blueprint

AI assistant and electronic health record for mental health therapists, from HelloJoy, Inc., which trades as Blueprint. The AI Assistant works from a recorded session or a dictated or typed summary and drafts progress notes, treatment plans, discharge summaries and after-visit client summaries, with note types for individual, couples, family and group therapy and psychiatry.

Source: AI Health Index, September 2026

Eleos Health

Voice based AI for community based care, marketed as CareOps automation, serving community behavioral health and substance use disorder treatment organizations and, since 2025, home health, hospice and palliative care.

Source: AI Health Index, September 2026

FAQ

Questions buyers ask

How do Blueprint and Eleos Health work with the EHR?

Blueprint's help center says there is no direct integration into another EHR: its Chrome extension overlays any site so a clinician can record and draft without leaving the chart, and notes are then copied and pasted in. With SimplePractice, the extension reads which client profiles were recently opened in order to suggest the right client.

Eleos also describes integrations with client systems over its own VPN without naming them. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified September 20, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

How are Blueprint and Eleos Health priced and sold?

In Blueprint's case, the AI Assistant is priced by session: $0.99 per session when used alongside another record system, with five free sessions, or $69 per seat with unlimited sessions, and $1.49 per session in the all-in-one EHR, after a 30 day free trial.

Eleos sells to provider organizations, community behavioral health, substance use disorder, home health and hospice agencies, through a demo and contract, and its site describes outcomes and time saved but not what drives the cost, whether clinicians, sessions, notes or modules. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified September 20, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

How do Blueprint and Eleos Health handle patient data?

Blueprint's privacy and security page states that client information is never sold, shared or used to train AI models, and that when a session is recorded the audio is deleted immediately after processing, with no recordings, copies or backups kept.

Eleos keeps the AI-generated note suggestions and user engagement data and states that it retains them for refining its models, together with minimal session identifying information: clinician ID, session date and time, client unique ID and name. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified September 20, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

How much do Blueprint and Eleos Health leave to the clinician?

For Blueprint, notes, summaries, treatment plans and AI-assisted suggestions start as drafts; the clinician reviews, edits or discards them; nothing enters the client record without approval; and finalized records are locked and versioned. Recording is optional, and a note can be drafted from a dictated or typed summary.

Eleos frames its product as augmented rather than autonomous intelligence: it drafts note content, which Eleos says covers about 80 percent of a typical progress note, and the provider reviews, tweaks and submits. Its Compliance product checks notes for documentation errors before claim submission, and Eleos states that it is not there to replace a provider's judgment about clinical care. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified September 20, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.

Keep Comparing

Related comparisons

Other published head to head assessments involving these vendors or their closest peers. The full set for this category is on the Ambient Scribes page.

Disclosure

Eleos publishes no price or pricing basis, so a small practice cannot size it, and its trial is small and single site while its marketing reaches further than one site can carry; ask for multi site results and any independent replication. Blueprint's terms say the service provides no clinical advice and makes no clinical decisions, while its pricing page sells answers to clinical questions and suggested interventions, and the vendor should be asked to reconcile the two.

Each states a security attestation as its own: Eleos names a combined SOC 2 Type II and HITRUST audit, Blueprint displays SOC 2 Type 2 on its home page and describes its audit results as perfect scores, which is not a result a buyer can check. Neither publishes performance compared across accent, dialect or language.