Andros vs Verifiable (2026)
A full service accredited network operation against a Salesforce native credentialing platform, and the deciding question is your stack. Verifiable's signature is architectural: it runs inside the customer's own Salesforce instance, so credentialing sits alongside CRM data the organisation already maintains and in infrastructure it already governs, and it offers both software and NCQA certified services. That design is a strong fit for Salesforce shops and a poor one for everyone else. Andros carries no platform dependency and brings more accreditation, dual NCQA and full URAC, and the fuller lifecycle including recruitment and contracting, but it grades C on interoperability as a centralized consolidation platform. Both hold NCQA CVO status and keep AI at arm's length. If you run on Salesforce and want credentialing native to it, start with Verifiable. If you want an accredited full service network partner regardless of stack, start with Andros.
- Accreditation and lifecycle depth: dual NCQA and full URAC CVO accreditation and the full network lifecycle including recruitment and contracting across an eight million provider repository, sold to health plans and large networks.
- Data gathering autonomy stated concretely: two of three applications reported to complete with no direct provider input, the source of its burden reduction.
- Architecture independent: as a managed network operation, Andros does not require the customer to run any particular platform to adopt it.
- A distinctive architecture for the right buyer: Verifiable runs natively inside the customer's own Salesforce instance, so credentialing and monitoring sit alongside existing CRM data rather than in a separate system, which also means credentialing data resides in infrastructure the customer already governs.
- Flexibility of model: license the software to run credentialing in house, use the NCQA certified verification organisation services, or combine them, with a reported throughput upwards of 225 packets per specialist per month.
- A cleaner interoperability position than Andros for Salesforce organisations, graded B on interoperability where Andros grades C as a centralized consolidation platform.
This comparison is published by AI Health Index, an independent research platform that compares healthcare AI vendors objectively. Andros and Verifiable are each graded against the same capability taxonomy, from each vendor's own public materials and the regulatory record, under the AI Health Index verification standard. No vendor pays for placement, and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Plain facts
| Fact | Andros | Verifiable |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Healthcare Administrative Automation | Healthcare Administrative Automation |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | New York, New York, United States | Austin, Texas, United States |
| Website | andros.co | verifiable.com |
Side by Side
Each record in one paragraph
Written to be quoted whole. Each paragraph states what the AI Health Index verified about the vendor, with the caveats attached. Generated from this pair’s live capability grades, so it moves when a grade moves.
The AI Health Index awards Andros its top capability grade on FDA and Regulatory Status. Set against Verifiable, Andros grades higher on Security Certifications and Trust Center and FDA and Regulatory Status. Its thinnest published disclosure sits on AI Liability and Recourse. Grades reflect evidence the AI Health Index could verify at the last review, so a low grade records disclosure the vendor has not published rather than a capability it has been shown to lack.
Source: AI Health Index, July 2026
The AI Health Index records no top capability grade for Verifiable on any axis it scores. Set against Andros, Verifiable grades higher on AI Liability and Recourse and EHR and Interoperability Depth. Grades reflect evidence the AI Health Index could verify at the last review, so a low grade records disclosure the vendor has not published rather than a capability it has been shown to lack.
Source: AI Health Index, July 2026
Questions buyers ask
Should we choose Andros or Verifiable?
On the axes where the AI Health Index separates them, Andros grades higher on Security Certifications and Trust Center and FDA and Regulatory Status, and Verifiable grades higher on AI Liability and Recourse and EHR and Interoperability Depth. Neither leads on the greater share of scored axes, so the decision turns on which constraint is binding rather than on an overall winner.
Where do Andros and Verifiable differ most?
The widest separation the AI Health Index records between Andros and Verifiable is on Security Certifications and Trust Center, where Andros grades B and Verifiable grades C. That axis sits in the Regulatory and Compliance group, so it should carry the most weight for a buyer whose binding constraint is where regulatory exposure sits and who carries it.
Where do Andros and Verifiable grade the same?
The AI Health Index grades Andros and Verifiable the same on several axes, including AI Centrality, Autonomy and Oversight Model and Model and Technology Transparency. Neither holds an advantage the index can evidence on those axes, so they should not carry weight in a selection between these two.
What have Andros and Verifiable not disclosed?
At the last review, at least one of Andros and Verifiable published thin or absent detail on AI Liability and Recourse. The AI Health Index treats an absent disclosure as a gap in the public record rather than a failure of the product, so these are the axes to get in writing during diligence instead of inferring from the grade.
Related comparisons
Other published head to head assessments involving these vendors or their closest peers. The full set for this category is on the Healthcare Administrative Automation page.
Both hold NCQA CVO status and both grade C on AI centrality, so this is an architecture and fit decision. Verifiable's Salesforce native design is its defining feature and its main constraint: a strong fit for Salesforce organisations and a poor one for everyone else, which is the single practical gating question.
Andros carries no such dependency but grades C on interoperability as a centralized platform with integration billed as project work, and it brings the deeper accreditation and the fuller lifecycle. Evidence is vendor reported and thin on both, C on each, though Verifiable's 225 packets per specialist figure is a concrete productivity metric and Andros's dual accreditation is real process validation. Neither publishes pricing. The decision is less about capability than about whether the organisation runs on Salesforce and whether it wants credentialing delivered as a service or run in house.