314e Dexit vs Tennr (2026)
Both read the documents that arrive at a healthcare organisation without asking permission, which is still mostly faxes, and they scope the job differently. Tennr is built specifically for inbound referral and document operations, with a proprietary vision language model reading unstructured material directly, aimed at the practice that loses referrals because nobody could process them fast enough. Dexit comes from a healthcare IT company that has been implementing in this market since 2004 and treats intelligent document processing as a general capability across the organisation rather than as one workflow. If referrals are the bleeding wound, Tennr is pointed at it. If you have four document problems and want one layer, Dexit is the broader purchase with a longer implementation history behind it. Ask both for touchless completion rates on document types that look like yours.
- Its proprietary vision language model reads unstructured inbound material directly, which is the harder problem in referral operations because most of what arrives is a fax of a scan of a form.
- Referral and document intake is the specific workflow rather than document processing in general, so the output is a routed, actionable referral rather than extracted text.
- For a specialty practice losing referrals to intake friction, the constraint is exactly what this product addresses.
- It comes from a healthcare IT company operating since 2004, so the implementation muscle and the health system relationships already exist.
- Intelligent document processing is treated as a general capability across the organisation rather than as one workflow, which suits a buyer with several document problems.
- For an organisation that wants one document layer rather than a referral tool, the broader scope avoids a second procurement later.
This comparison is published by AI Health Index, an independent research platform that compares healthcare AI vendors objectively. 314e Dexit and Tennr are each graded against the same capability taxonomy, from each vendor's own public materials and the regulatory record, under the AI Health Index verification standard. No vendor pays for placement, and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Plain facts
Side by Side
Each record in one paragraph
Written to be quoted whole. Each paragraph states what the AI Health Index verified about the vendor, with the caveats attached. Generated from this pair’s live capability grades, so it moves when a grade moves.
The AI Health Index awards 314e Dexit its top capability grade on AI Centrality. Set against Tennr, 314e Dexit grades higher on Security Certifications and Trust Center, AI Liability and Recourse and Deployment Model and Data Residency. Grades reflect evidence the AI Health Index could verify at the last review, so a low grade records disclosure the vendor has not published rather than a capability it has been shown to lack.
Source: AI Health Index, August 2026
The AI Health Index awards Tennr its top capability grade on AI Centrality. Set against 314e Dexit, Tennr grades higher on Clinical and Operational Evidence, EHR and Interoperability Depth and Setting and Specialty Coverage. Grades reflect evidence the AI Health Index could verify at the last review, so a low grade records disclosure the vendor has not published rather than a capability it has been shown to lack.
Source: AI Health Index, August 2026
Questions buyers ask
Should we choose 314e Dexit or Tennr?
On the axes where the AI Health Index separates them, 314e Dexit grades higher on Security Certifications and Trust Center, AI Liability and Recourse and Deployment Model and Data Residency, and Tennr grades higher on Clinical and Operational Evidence, EHR and Interoperability Depth and Setting and Specialty Coverage. Neither leads on the greater share of scored axes, so the decision turns on which constraint is binding rather than on an overall winner.
Where do 314e Dexit and Tennr differ most?
The widest separation the AI Health Index records between 314e Dexit and Tennr is on Security Certifications and Trust Center, where 314e Dexit grades B and Tennr grades C. That axis sits in the Regulatory and Compliance group, so it should carry the most weight for a buyer whose binding constraint is where regulatory exposure sits and who carries it.
Where do 314e Dexit and Tennr grade the same?
The AI Health Index grades 314e Dexit and Tennr the same on several axes, including AI Centrality, Autonomy and Oversight Model and Model and Technology Transparency. Neither holds an advantage the index can evidence on those axes, so they should not carry weight in a selection between these two.
Related comparisons
Other published head to head assessments involving these vendors or their closest peers. The full set for this category is on the Healthcare Administrative Automation page.
Document intake products are bought on touchless rate, and neither vendor publishes one in a form that can be compared: the honest measure is what proportion of inbound documents complete without human handling, measured against the vendor's own exception queue rather than a theoretical baseline. Ask both for that number on document types resembling yours, since performance on a clean electronic referral tells you nothing about a faxed handwritten form. Neither publishes pricing. For any product reading inbound clinical documents, establish retention and whether customer documents are used to improve models, because the sender of a fax has consented to nothing.