Aiberry vs Videra Health (2026)
Both read a person's face, voice and words to produce a mental health signal, and they are sold to different buyers with very different assurance behind them. Aiberry is a screening front door. Its products are anonymous with no sign in, sold to organizations as a way into care rather than as care, with one tier now published at $5,000 a year. The anonymity is a real minimization decision rather than a marketing line, and it also means no clinician sits between the model and the person answering. Videra Health is the clinical platform. It sends assessments, analyses what the patient says, how they say it and how they look while saying it, and returns the result into a behavioral health record system, naming Kipu, Alleva, BestNotes and BlueStep among seven. It publishes a redisclosure consent notice as a standing page, describes its handling controls in operational detail, and runs a public trust portal. The gap between them is what a buyer can check. Videra publishes a documented security program with the report behind an agreement. Aiberry's entire published security posture is a badge in the footer.
- Screening is the job and anonymity is the point: no sign in, no account, and a design that collects less rather than promising to protect more.
- One tier carries a published figure, which lets an organization size the entry cost without a sales conversation.
- There is a real peer reviewed study behind the instrument, correctly disclosed in the journal.
- The result has to reach the chart: seven record systems are named, four of them behavioral health systems rather than general ones.
- Data handling is described in operational detail rather than asserted, with a redisclosure consent notice published as a standing page.
- Coverage runs across levels of care, including the populations where repeated structured assessment actually changes decisions.
This comparison is published by AI Health Index, an independent research platform that compares healthcare AI vendors objectively. Aiberry and Videra Health are each graded against the same capability taxonomy, from each vendor's own public materials and the regulatory record, under the AI Health Index verification standard. No vendor pays for placement, and no vendor has reviewed this page. How this evidence is graded
Plain facts
| Fact | Aiberry | Videra Health |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Behavioral Health AI | Behavioral Health AI |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington, United States | Orem, Utah, United States |
| Website | aiberry.com | viderahealth.com |
Side by Side
Select any grade to read the note behind it.
Each vendor in one paragraph
Written to be quoted whole. Each paragraph opens the AI Health Index profile of the vendor: what the product is, who buys it and what it does.
Aiberry sells anonymous mental health screening to organizations, positioned as a digital front door to care rather than as care. Two products are named and a third tier is quoted.
Source: AI Health Index, September 2026
Videra Health builds multimodal artificial intelligence for behavioral health, analyzing what a patient says, how they say it, and how they look while saying it. The platform sends asynchronous video, voice or text check ins that patients complete on their own devices in roughly three minutes, and scores them against established clinical instruments.
Source: AI Health Index, September 2026
Questions buyers ask
How do Aiberry and Videra Health work with the EHR?
For Aiberry, the company states that getting started requires no complex integrations or training, with a customized link configured within a few business days, which confirms the position rather than answering it.
With Videra Health, a vendor naming the niche systems as well as the two large ones has usually built to them, and the company states that connecting once to the record system unlocks the full product set. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified September 20, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.
How are Aiberry and Videra Health priced and sold?
In Aiberry's case, an annual organizational license with no usage cap is a stated basis of charge, and for a screening product deployed across a school, a workplace or a facility the absence of a per screening meter is the fact that decides affordability.
For Videra Health, two fragments are the whole of what exists. A professional association partnership offers members 20 percent off annual software subscription fees, which establishes an annual subscription basis and nothing further. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified September 20, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.
How do Aiberry and Videra Health handle patient data?
With Aiberry, the minimization is a design choice rather than a policy sentence, and it now covers both named products. Digital MindCare and Smart AI MindCare are both stated to require no sign in and to be completely anonymous.
In Videra Health's case, the detail is specific rather than gestural. AES-256 and TLS encryption in transit and at rest, applied across disk, application and database layers, with key access restricted, key sharing prohibited and key management reviewed annually. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified September 20, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.
What evidence is published for Aiberry and Videra Health?
For Aiberry, the study itself is solid, and it is not a preprint. It appeared in the Journal of Affective Disorders in 2024, a respected psychiatry title, led from the University of Texas at Austin with the Georgetown University Medical Center and the University of Arizona.
With Videra Health, the headline claim is a clinical outcome claim: a 64 percent reduction in crisis driven interventions, stated on the home page across more than 300 facilities and over a million patient interactions. From the AI Health Index, drawn from each vendor's own published materials and the regulatory record, verified September 20, 2026. No vendor pays for placement.
Related comparisons
Other published head to head assessments involving these vendors or their closest peers. The full set for this category is on the Clinical Decision Support page.
Both make a clinical inference from voice, face and language, and neither publishes performance compared across accent, dialect, age or first language, which is the question this technology turns on. Videra asserts consistent performance across populations without per group results; Aiberry is the one record in this group that publishes any per group figure, and it is partial.
Videra's headline is a clinical outcome claim, a sixty four percent reduction in crisis driven interventions, and its published research measures agreement with clinical references rather than outcomes, so ask which study supports the number. Aiberry names no record system at all and presents the absence of integration as a feature; it publishes no security page, trust center or external attestation, and its compliance claim is a footer badge. Neither identifies any party in its model supply chain. Ask both what happens when the model flags someone at risk and nobody is watching the screen.