Wavo Health
Wavo Health describes itself as an AI clinical workspace rather than a scribe alone, turning conversations into notes, visit preparation, patient context, coding cues and follow up content, with an AI clinical assistant that answers questions about medications, billing codes and patient history. Its specialty work is the reason to look at it, because it is specified at the level of the instruments clinicians actually use rather than as a template count. Its rheumatology support documents tender and swollen joint counts and assists with DAS28, CDAI and RAPID3 disease activity scores; its oncology support handles TNM staging, chemotherapy, radiation and immunotherapy regimens and prepares tumour board summaries; its internal medicine coverage extends to admission histories, daily progress notes, discharge summaries and transitions of care, so it reaches inpatient note types most outpatient scribes ignore. It also generates patient education materials, syncs between mobile and desktop mid workflow, and states a review, edit and approve sequence before a note is used. No EHR integration is documented anywhere.
Capability Axes
Speech recognition, note generation, the clinical assistant and patient material generation are all model output, with no services layer or legacy platform underneath.
The gate is stated as a three step sequence rather than an implied one: review, edit, then APPROVE the generated note before it is used. Naming approval as a distinct action after review is a small but meaningful precision, since it makes acceptance deliberate. Held at B because no acceptance rate, edit burden figure or confidence threshold is published, and because the clinical assistant answering medication and coding questions carries no described limits of its own.
Both performance claims are unfalsifiable as written: industry leading accuracy, which cites no comparison, and saving up to 50 percent of documentation time, which the up to construction satisfies at any value. No accuracy figure, model card, named models or evaluation methodology was located. The specialty vocabulary work described below is real capability rather than measurement.
Testimonials only, and unnamed ones, including a clinician reporting an hour long complex visit documented in two minutes. No study, controlled evaluation, accuracy benchmark, third party rating, named customer or deployment count was located.
Not assessed. HIPAA compliance and robust security are asserted, but no retention schedule for audio or transcripts, no de identification practice and no statement on whether customer content trains models was located.
HIPAA compliance stated consistently across product and pricing materials. Business associate agreement terms are not published for inspection, and the product is self serve with a free trial so use can begin before any agreement conversation.
Not assessed. No named or dated attestation and no trust centre located in this pass.
Not a regulated medical device and none claimed for documentation. Flag rather than grade: the AI clinical assistant is described as giving instant, evidence based guidance in response to questions about medications, which is advice rather than record keeping and sits closer to regulated decision support than note generation.
Nothing located. No fairness statement, subgroup analysis or accent and dialect performance disclosure, and no language coverage is claimed despite the site being structured for multiple locales. Worth recording that coding cues are offered WITHOUT any revenue lift or capture language attached, which keeps this vendor off the coding gradient this index tracks rather than at its mild end.
Not assessed, and the absence is total rather than partial. No electronic health record integration, named system, write back mechanism or even a copy and paste workflow was described anywhere in the located material. For a product positioning itself as a clinical workspace with a patient dashboard, that suggests the note lives in Wavo and the clinician moves it, but nothing states this either way. Establish it before evaluating, because it determines whether this is a documentation tool or a parallel record.
Not assessed. Multi device use is supported with documentation begun on mobile syncing to desktop, and the Android application is a wrapped web app rather than native. No hosting region, residency option or sub processor detail was located.
Partial. A seven day free trial of the Pro tier is published along with a pricing page and plan FAQ, and custom enterprise plans are described for larger practices, hospitals and health systems. No rate, tier figure or per clinician price was retrieved in this pass, so a buyer knows the shape of the offer and not the cost.
Fewer specialties than several competitors claim, specified far more concretely than most. Rheumatology support documents tender and swollen joint counts and assists with DAS28, CDAI and RAPID3, which are validated disease activity instruments rather than note headings. Oncology handles TNM staging, chemotherapy, radiation and immunotherapy regimens, and tumour board summaries. Internal medicine reaches inpatient territory with admission histories and physicals, daily progress notes, discharge summaries and transitions of care, which most outpatient scribes do not attempt. Gastroenterology and physical therapy with functional outcomes are also covered. Naming the instrument rather than the specialty is the mark of genuine depth, in the same class as Marvix's laterality propagation and Lime's OASIS handling. Held at B because the specialty list is short and no language coverage is published.
Pricing
Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.
| Entry Price | Pricing Basis | BAA Tier | Implementation | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Not retrieved. Seven day free trial of Wavo Pro; custom enterprise plans offered.
|
Tiered with a Pro plan and custom enterprise pricing for large practices, hospitals and health systems. Rates not retrieved in this pass. | HIPAA compliance stated. BAA terms not published, and the free trial begins before any agreement conversation. | None published. Self serve with multi device access; no integration project described because no integration is described. | Vendor Published |
A seven day Pro trial is published and enterprise plans are offered for larger organisations, but no rate was retrieved. The question that matters more than price here is where the note ends up: no EHR integration of any kind is documented, so establish whether output is pushed, pasted or simply kept in Wavo's own patient dashboard. If it is the last of those, the product is a parallel record rather than a documentation tool, which changes both the workflow cost and the medico legal position. Ask separately what limits apply to the clinical assistant, since answering medication questions with evidence based guidance is a different liability surface from writing a note.