PaceMate pricing

The billing disclosure is stated in the buyer's own terms. The remote monitoring procedure codes the platform handles are named individually. The 31 day and 91 day cycles that determine when a transmission becomes billable are tracked in the workflow, with patients surfaced before the window closes. Missed charge recovery runs continuously rather than on request. Annual code updates are maintained by the vendor. Billing data synchronizes bidirectionally with Epic, Oracle Health and athenahealth. Two outcomes are attached: 75 percent average billing capture within 90 days of go live, and 98 percent of manual billing entry eliminated.

For a device clinic that is a testable proposition about what it can recover from payers. Remote monitoring revenue is lost through missed cycles and undocumented review rather than through poor rates, so a clinic can measure its current capture and estimate the gain before signing. It does not say what the clinic pays PaceMate.

The delivery model is disclosed in tiers, described as self service, periodic support or fully tailored, which tells a prospect that the labor component is variable and negotiable.

What is missing is every cost figure: no per patient or per clinic rate, no platform fee, no pricing for the service tiers, no implementation cost, no contract term and no minimum. Whether the consumer electrocardiogram integration through AliveCor carries additional cost is also unstated.

The company cites 14 integrated device manufacturers without listing them, so which manufacturers are supported at discrete data level is not published.