Healthcare Cybersecurity
O

Ordr

ORDR (formerly styled Ordr) sells connected device security for healthcare, manufacturing, finance, government and other sectors, built around turning device intelligence into enforced network segmentation. On-site sensors watch traffic passively, without agents or active scanning, and in-house machine learning, which the company says was trained on more than 100 million real devices, classifies each device, baselines its behavior and flags anomalies; the platform correlates vulnerabilities, manufacturer advisories and network exposure to rank risk, and enriches the customer's CMDB from more than 130 integrations.

AI Protect for Segmentation writes least-privilege policies from observed behavior, shows the effect of enforcement before any rule changes, and applies approved policies through the hospital's existing firewalls and NAC. ORDR IQ, launched in November 2025 as a multi-agent assistant, answers questions in plain language and automates investigations; it runs on an enterprise language model with zero data retention, or one the customer supplies, and the privacy policy says no customer data trains outside models.

The production platform runs on AWS in us-east-1 under a SOC 2 Type II report (Security, Availability, Confidentiality) available under NDA. Dayton Children's Hospital uses it with Cisco ISE for segmentation, and case studies name Franciscan Health, Beebe Healthcare and others. No price or business associate position is published. Ask what ORDR IQ may do without approval and whether ORDR signs a business associate agreement.

AI Health Index verifiedSeptember 29, 2026
Compare Ordr with other vendors
Founded
—
Headquarters
Santa Clara, California, United States
Website
ordr.net
Categories
healthcare-cybersecurity
Indexed Products
ORDR AI Protect for Security, ORDR AI Protect for Segmentation, ORDR IQ (multi-agent assistant), ORDR platform (asset intelligence and CMDB enrichment)
Buyer Segments
Hospitals and health systems, Healthcare security and network teams, Clinical engineering teams, Manufacturing, financial services and government organizations
Assessment

Capability Axes

An AI Health Index grade measures what a buyer can verify from public sources on the date shown. It is not a rating of how good the product is. A vendor can build an excellent system and grade low on an axis because it publishes nothing an outsider can check. How grades read

AI Capability
BB on AI CentralityThe model is the engine of a core module. The platform carries other value, but this capability does not exist without it.
Vendor Published

Models classify devices and write policy inside a platform with other value. ORDR's in-house machine learning profiles devices from passive traffic (trained, the company says, on more than 100 million real devices), baselines their behavior, and writes least-privilege segmentation policies; ORDR IQ adds a language-model assistant and agents. Inventory drawn from 130-plus integrations, CMDB enrichment, security control gap reports, compliance evidence and enforcement through existing firewalls and NAC would still stand without the models.

BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelThe oversight structure is described and one part is missing, commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Policy changes are simulated and approved before enforcement; the agents' limits are not published. The platform shows every device group, allowed flow and policy gap, simulates the impact of enforcement and asks the operator to approve before rules change, and enforcement runs through the customer's own firewalls and NAC. ORDR IQ, launched in November 2025 as a multi-agent orchestrator, is described as automating investigations and decisions, with no published list of what it may do without approval.

BB on Model and Technology TransparencyThe approach or the suppliers are named without the version and update discipline behind them. Naming a supplier is the entry to this band both here and on Model Supply Chain Disclosure, which ask different questions of the same disclosure: who receives the data, and what produces the output.
Vendor Published

The approach is named without versions or evaluation. Device profiling uses in-house machine learning built on behavior from more than 100 million real devices rather than synthetic data, with behavioral baselines and ML-written least-privilege policies; ORDR IQ runs on any enterprise language model with zero data retention, including one the customer brings. No model version, update practice or accuracy figure is published.

BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an in house build, a cleared model that cannot be quietly swapped, or a deployment where the transfer does not occur at all. Naming the model provider exits the band below into this one; the axis rises from here on the completeness of the party list and on the terms that govern data once it arrives.
Vendor Published

A short chain for the device models and a customer-selectable one for the assistant. The profiling models are built and run in ORDR's own data center, and ORDR IQ uses an enterprise language model under zero data retention, which the customer can replace with its own; production runs on AWS us-east-1. The default language model provider is not named and no subprocessor list is published.

CC on Clinical and Operational EvidenceNamed customers, or vendor reported percentages with no method, denominator or reference standard. Scale of use is recorded here and is not treated as evidence of benefit.
Vendor Published

Named health system customers without outcome figures. Dayton Children's Hospital describes using ORDR with Cisco ISE to classify devices into segmented VLANs across 25,000 new devices, and case studies are listed for Franciscan Health, Beebe Healthcare, ProHealth, Fairview and Emplify Health. The company cites more than 100 million devices classified and 500-plus customers, and KLAS named it a market leader in 2022. None of it comes with a before and after figure or a stated method.

BB on AI Safety and PHI StewardshipCategorical commitments are published, such as no training on customer data, without the retention schedule behind them.
Vendor Published

Categorical commitments on training and retention for the AI features. The privacy policy says the device profiling models are built in house and run in ORDR's own data center without exposing customer data to third-party models or outside training; ORDR IQ runs with zero data retention always on, processes input in real time, deletes it after computation, and never uses it to train models. The SOC 2 page adds secure data destruction at contract end. No retention schedule for collected device traffic is published, and nothing says whether customer traffic trains ORDR's own device models.

Regulatory and Compliance
CC on HIPAA and BAA PostureA status is stated but not supported: compliance is claimed, or business associate status stated, without the underlying document, including where the only privacy notice published covers the website rather than the service that handles patients. The mirror case grades here as well: a substantive privacy document that reaches the service, with no statement of business associate status anywhere and no scope position taken. One of the two elements the band above asks for is present, which is a grade below it and not a grade at the floor.
Vendor Published

A service privacy policy with no business associate position. The privacy policy covers ORDR's hosted products, and the healthcare page carries a "HIPAA Compliant" badge, but no page states business associate status, offers an agreement, or says the platform does not handle PHI. Device traffic on clinical networks can carry PHI.

BB on Security Certifications and Trust CenterA recognized certification is named in the vendor own material without the artifact, or with a scope or renewal question the buyer has to raise. A recognized certification here is an audit of how the vendor operates security, such as SOC 2, HITRUST or ISO/IEC 27001. A certification has a scope and a clock, and both are part of this grade. A certification the vendor attaches to its data center, hosting facility or cloud provider, rather than presenting as its own, is the host's and does not count here.
Vendor Published

A recognized attestation is named with its scope, and the report is under NDA. The SOC 2 page says ORDR holds a SOC 2 Type II report from an independent PCAOB-registered firm covering Security, Availability and Confidentiality over a 12-month period, scoped to the SaaS platform on AWS us-east-1, with independent penetration testing; the report is available under NDA. The trust center page reset the connection when read. No ISO 27001 is held.

BB on FDA and Regulatory StatusThe pathway is stated and in progress, or a clearance is named without the vintage and scope a buyer needs to match it to the product on offer.
Vendor Published

No device claim, with compliance work named for the security regimes a hospital answers to. The platform is security software without a clearance and needs none. It collects compliance evidence aligned to NIST, CIS, HIPAA and PCI and publishes material on the new HIPAA Security Rule provisions, but nothing addresses FDA device recalls or manufacturer disclosure statements, and no page states ORDR's own regulatory position.

CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence is committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it. Most of the index sits here.
Vendor Published

Policy language, with no evaluation of the models. The published generative AI policy governs how ORDR employees use outside AI tools rather than how the product's models are tested, and the privacy policy describes ORDR IQ's data protections. The company publishes no accuracy, false positive or classification result, and nothing reports performance by device type or manufacturer.

CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms exist that let someone challenge an output, such as audit trails, source traceability or review before commit, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the harmed party.
Vendor Published

Review before enforcement and audit logs exist; nothing stands behind the output. Generated policies are simulated and approved before they change the network, and ORDR IQ keeps audit logs of access, usage and administrative actions. No error rate, warranty, indemnity or remediation commitment is published. A misclassified device can be segmented wrongly, yet the company gives no classification precision by device class and no contract term for an enforced policy that disrupts care.

Integration and Deployment
AA on EHR and Interoperability DepthNamed bidirectional integrations with major record systems, verifiable in marketplace listings or integration documentation, with evidence the connection runs in production.
Vendor Published

It does not connect to the clinical record; its integrations with the hospital's security and IT systems of record are named and run in production. The company cites more than 130 integrations, including Cisco ISE, ServiceNow CMDB enrichment, Nuvolo, Qualys, firewalls and VMware NSX, pushing device context to enforcement points and filling gaps in the CMDB. Dayton Children's runs ORDR with Cisco ISE to place devices in segmented VLANs.

BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyOptions and residency are stated with isolation or the processing path left open.
Vendor Published

SaaS with its region stated, and one option. The SOC 2 page places the production platform on AWS in the United States (us-east-1), with customer data segregated in a multi-tenant environment, and ORDR IQ in an isolated private-cloud environment; sensors collect traffic on site without agents or active scanning. No on-premises option, other region or cross-border processing is described.

Commercial
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and the posture is discoverable: a buyer can establish how the product is sold and what drives the cost before contacting the vendor. Most of the index sits here.
Vendor Published

No price is published, and the sales route is discoverable. The platform is sold as AI Protect for Security, AI Protect for Segmentation and ORDR IQ, with a free ORDR IQ sandbox and a demo request. No unit of charge or tier is published.

AA on Setting and Specialty CoverageWhere the product is validated to operate is named and supported, settings and specialties both, whether the coverage is broad or deliberately narrow.
Vendor Published

Healthcare settings are named and supported by named sites. ORDR covers IT, IoT, OT, clinical and cloud assets for health systems, including connected medical devices that cannot run agents, and named deployments at Dayton Children's Hospital, Franciscan Health, Beebe Healthcare and others; it also serves manufacturing, finance, government and retail.

Tracked Since Listing

Product updates

Material product, regulatory, evidence and commercial changes at Ordr, each verified against a live source and tagged to the capability axis it bears on. Funding rounds and awards are not product changes and are not logged.

Jul 29, 2026Product / capability

Ordr announced expanded ecosystem integrations across security, IT, and Zero Trust workflows, including a new integration with TruAsset. This update directly maps critical medical device security data, such as FDA recalls, CVEs, and network anomalies, into clinical engineering and asset management systems.

Bears on: EHR and Interoperability DepthSource
Our read on this update →Tracked since Jul 2026
Alternatives

Alternatives to Ordr

Vendors in the same categories as Ordr whose graded profiles look most alike, with a line on what each product does.

Similar is not the same, so check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Asimily sells an exposure management platform for connected devices (medical devices, IoT, OT and IT endpoints), with hospitals and health systems as its founding market and customers in…

Censinet sells Censinet RiskOps, a risk management platform built for hospitals and health systems.

Armis sells Armis Centrix, a cyber exposure management platform covering IT, OT, IoT, medical devices, cloud and code.

Medication and compliance intelligence company whose two surveillance products watch hospital staff for insider risk: ControlCheck, formerly Bluesight for Controlled Substances, for drug…

Claroty sells cyber-physical systems security to hospitals, industry, commercial buildings and government, and its healthcare product is Claroty xDome for Healthcare, built on Medigate…

Finite State sells a product security platform to makers of connected devices, including medical device manufacturers, automotive, energy, industrial and government suppliers.

Ordered by how closely the graded profiles match across the fifteen axes, inside the same categories. See how each axis is graded in the methodology.

Comparisons

Compared With

Each comparison carries a written verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side. Pairs that cross a category boundary are grouped separately, and their verdicts state where the boundary sits rather than manufacturing a head to head.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

Entry Price Pricing Basis BAA Tier Implementation Source
Not published
Not published. Sold by module (AI Protect for Security, AI Protect for Segmentation, ORDR IQ) through demos, with a free ORDR IQ sandbox. Not published. No business associate status or agreement is stated. Not published. Vendor Published

No price, tier or unit of charge is published; a free ORDR IQ sandbox lets a buyer try the assistant before a sales call.

Three things to settle. The licensing unit, since per device, per site and per module pricing behave very differently across a large device fleet. Whether ORDR IQ and segmentation are priced apart from core discovery. And the stated timelines (full visibility in 24 to 48 hours on one page, 48 to 72 on another, enforcement in days), which are worth writing into the contract as acceptance criteria.