Digital Pathology AI
I

Indica Labs

Albuquerque based digital pathology company whose HALO AP Dx platform is FDA 510(k) cleared for primary diagnosis with named scanners (K232833 with the Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S360MD; K252762 adding the Leica Aperio GT 450 DX). HALO AP, which runs Indica's own AI (Breast IHC AI, Lung PD-L1 AI, Prostate AI) and hosted third party AI, is CE-IVDR marked in Europe, the UK and Switzerland and research use only in the United States. The platform integrates with laboratory information systems in both directions, and Indica's Cloud Services run HALO on AWS inside an account the customer controls. The company also sells HALO and HALO AI for research image analysis.

AI Health Index verifiedSeptember 28, 2026
Compare Indica Labs with other vendors
Founded
2007
Headquarters
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Website
indicalab.com
Categories
pathology-ai, diagnostics-and-genomics, clinical-trials-ai
Indexed Products
HALO AP Dx, HALO AP, Aperio HALO AP
Buyer Segments
Clinical pathology laboratories, Academic medical centers and cancer institutes, Contract research organizations, Pharmaceutical and translational research
Assessment

Capability Axes

An AI Health Index grade measures what a buyer can verify from public sources on the date shown. It is not a rating of how good the product is. A vendor can build an excellent system and grade low on an axis because it publishes nothing an outsider can check. How grades read

AI Capability
CC on AI CentralityArtificial intelligence is a feature layer on a product whose value stands without it. A learned component is a model whose parameters are estimated from data: machine learning, or a statistical model fitted to population data, including one then updated on the patient measurements. A fixed formula, a rule set, or a feedback controller that adjusts a dosing factor from the patient own readings is not one, however patient specific its output and whatever the vendor calls the adjustment.
Vendor Published

The cleared product is a platform, not an algorithm. HALO AP Dx is an enterprise digital pathology workspace whose FDA clearance covers primary diagnosis, meaning viewing and diagnosing from digital slides, and that clearance rests on the platform plus scanner pairing rather than on AI performance.

AI is a real and central part of the offering, including hosted third party algorithms and the company's own image analysis, but a laboratory could deploy the cleared platform for digital primary diagnosis and use no AI at all. That makes HALO an established platform that adds AI, which is not the same as a product that is AI.

BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelThe oversight structure is described and one part is missing, commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

The platform's cleared function is to let a pathologist make the primary diagnosis on a digital slide, so the human is the diagnostic actor by design. Algorithms accessed through the associated store are assistive and, as the company notes, carry their own separate regulatory classifications, which is an important disclosure: platform clearance does not extend to the algorithms running on it.

CC on Model and Technology TransparencyThe architecture is described in general terms with nothing identified. Proprietary is asserted rather than explained.
Vendor Published

The regulatory scope is stated with real precision, including clearance numbers tied to named scanner hardware, and the company is consistently explicit about which product is cleared and which is research use only. What is not published is model level detail on its own AI, training data, or validation, because the disclosure emphasis sits on platform clearance and integration rather than algorithm performance. Transparent about scope, quiet about models.

BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an in house build, a cleared model that cannot be quietly swapped, or a deployment where the transfer does not occur at all. Naming the model provider exits the band below into this one; the axis rises from here on the completeness of the party list and on the terms that govern data once it arrives.
Vendor Published

The host is named and the tenancy is the customer's, with the hosted algorithm layer undescribed. Indica's Cloud Services run HALO on Amazon Web Services inside an AWS account the customer controls, so the cloud provider is named and the data sits in the customer's own tenancy; laboratories can also run HALO on their own infrastructure. Indica builds its own AI (Breast IHC AI, Lung PD-L1 AI, Prostate AI and the HALO AI trainable classifier), so no outside model provider sits behind those. The platform also hosts third party AI, with a strategic alliance with Lunit named, and third party algorithms run inside HALO AP.

No subprocessor list is published, and nothing says what data a hosted third party algorithm receives, where it processes it, or whether that vendor may retain or train on it.

The host named and the model layer in house, with the hosted partners' terms missing.

CC on Clinical and Operational EvidenceNamed customers, or vendor reported percentages with no method, denominator or reference standard. Scale of use is recorded here and is not treated as evidence of benefit.
Vendor Published

Cleared and widely deployed, with little published about how well the AI performs. The 510(k) clearances for HALO AP Dx rest on validation of the viewing platform for primary diagnosis, and the company names deployments at the National Cancer Institute, the University of Washington (40 percent AWS cost savings in four months, a vendor figure), Nottingham University Hospitals, the University of Bern and Source BioScience. The AI product pages describe their benefit in words (standardized scoring, reduced interobserver variability without compromising accuracy) and publish no study, method or figure for Breast IHC AI, Lung PD-L1 AI or Prostate AI.

Named customers and vendor figures without method for the AI products.

CC on AI Safety and PHI StewardshipGeneral assurances of privacy and security that do not answer the questions artificial intelligence raises: what is retained, what reaches a model, and what happens to it there.
Vendor Published

General compliance assurances, with the customer's own cloud account doing the real work, and nothing on retention or training. The product pages state that HALO AP provides built-in compliance with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 (electronic records and audit trails), HIPAA and GDPR. Under Cloud Services the deployment sits in an AWS account the customer controls, which keeps slide images in the customer's tenancy rather than a vendor environment. The privacy policy (effective 15 May 2026) covers the website, webinars and marketing, not the platform or slide images.

No retention period, deletion position, de-identification practice or statement on whether customer images train Indica's models or third party hosted models is published, and nothing describes what a hosted third party algorithm receives. Safety engineering, meaning how a wrong model output is handled as a safety event, is not published.

General assurances that do not answer retention, training use or de identification.

Regulatory and Compliance
CC on HIPAA and BAA PostureA status is stated but not supported: compliance is claimed, or business associate status stated, without the underlying document, including where the only privacy notice published covers the website rather than the service that handles patients. The mirror case grades here as well: a substantive privacy document that reaches the service, with no statement of business associate status anywhere and no scope position taken. One of the two elements the band above asks for is present, which is a grade below it and not a grade at the floor.
Vendor Published

HIPAA compliance is claimed as a built-in property, with no business associate position or service document behind it. The product pages state that HALO AP provides built-in compliance with HIPAA alongside FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and GDPR, and the platform is sold to US clinical laboratories through HALO AP Dx and under a managed cloud service in which Indica's team runs the customer's AWS environment. No business associate status is stated, no agreement is named or published, and the only privacy policy (effective 15 May 2026) covers the website, webinars and marketing rather than the platform or patient data.

Compliance claimed without a business associate position or a service privacy document.

CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterControls are described with an outside check behind them, such as independent penetration testing on a stated cadence, but no attestation against a recognized framework. A certification that tests the software security features rather than the vendor operations, such as federal health IT certification, is an outside check of this kind.
Vendor Published

An outside check of the cloud deployment, and no security attestation. The Cloud Services page says Indica's AWS deployments of HALO are validated by AWS, with Amazon CloudWatch monitoring and an AWS certified team running them, and the company is an AWS Partner Network member. The product pages state built in compliance with 21 CFR Part 11 electronic record controls, HIPAA and GDPR, and the company holds ISO 13485:2016, a medical device quality standard rather than a security one. No ISO 27001 certificate, SOC 2 report, HITRUST certification, trust center or penetration testing statement is published.

The controls have an outside check of the cloud architecture behind them, but none of it is attested against a recognized security framework.

AA on FDA and Regulatory StatusThe regulatory position is unambiguous and verifiable: a clearance or authorization identifiable in the public databases, with the version and indication it actually covers.
Regulatory Filing

The regulatory position is identifiable, and the company keeps the AI out of the cleared label. FDA's database lists two 510(k)s for HALO AP Dx: K232833 (7 May 2024, product code PSY), with the Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S360MD, and K252762 (25 November 2025, QKQ), adding the Leica Biosystems Aperio GT 450 DX. The HALO AP Dx page states that it is FDA cleared for primary diagnosis in the United States and approved with the Aperio GT 450 DX and named displays for SVS and DICOM files; the clearance is for the platform, not for an algorithm.

The AI products carry their own stated positions. HALO AP, the platform that runs Indica's AI and third party AI, is CE-IVDR marked for in vitro diagnostic use in Europe, the UK and Switzerland and is stated to be research use only in the United States and not FDA cleared for clinical diagnostic use. Breast IHC AI 2.0 is stated to be research use only and not intended for clinical diagnostic use, and Prostate AI is described as CE-IVD marked. No AI product is called FDA cleared.

BB on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureA governance framework with named process behind it, such as certification to an artificial intelligence management standard, or material written for a customer own review committee to evaluate the product with. A framework covering the vendor whole portfolio counts when its scope reaches this product; what it cannot supply is the product specific evaluation the band above asks for. Published results within the one group where the performance of this product is most at risk also sit here: evaluation on the question this axis asks, short of the comparison across groups the band above requires. A medical device clearance or certification, and the quality system behind it, does not reach this band on its own; it is graded under regulatory status. A regulator reviewed plan governing how the model may change does reach it.
Vendor Published

The company answers the platform's governance question with product rather than policy. Where customers build their own models, the question is who establishes that a customer built model works. HALO AI ships validation workflows as a feature: users train classifiers, run them against a validation set, and see regions of interest marked for true positives, false positives and false negatives, with the process centralized rather than assembled by hand. That is material for the laboratory's own review of the model, placed with the party that built it.

Three gaps remain. The tooling shows whether a customer's classifier works on that customer's validation set, not how Indica's own AI products perform across patient groups, scanners or stains, and no subgroup results are published for them. There is no responsible AI statement or AI management system certification. And for hosted third party algorithms, nothing published says who validates one in a given laboratory, who monitors it after go live, or where accountability sits when it is wrong.

What exists supports the customer's own evaluation of its models and stops short of subgroup results.

CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms exist that let someone challenge an output, such as audit trails, source traceability or review before commit, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the harmed party.
Vendor Published

Mechanisms let a pathologist check and trace results, and nothing stands behind the output. Breast IHC AI reports the percentage of positive cells and the biomarker score at slide level together with image analysis masks the pathologist can inspect in HALO AP, and the platform claims built-in 21 CFR Part 11 compliance, meaning audit trails and record integrity controls that let a laboratory reconstruct who changed what. The pathologist signs out every case, and the AI products are research use only in the United States.

No error rate with a method and denominator is published for Indica's AI products on the product pages; the clearances concern the viewing platform, whose performance is not an error rate of an AI function. No warranty, indemnity or remediation commitment attaches to an AI result.

Review and audit mechanisms with nothing attached to the output.

Integration and Deployment
BB on EHR and Interoperability DepthNamed systems with read access or one directional writing, or standards support with named deployments behind it.
Vendor Published

Two way LIS integration is described, with the systems themselves unnamed. The HALO AP Dx page says the platform assembles cases from barcodes and LIS or LIMS data, keeps worklists updated from the LIS, generates the pathology report and sends it automatically to the LIS through an interface, and offers API-first connectivity; it is DICOM compliant and cleared for SVS and DICOM files from the Leica Aperio GT 450 DX. It directs buyers to email for the list of existing LIS and LIMS integrations rather than publishing it. Voicebrook's VoiceOver PRO integrates for voice navigation and reporting, and the platform hosts third party AI, including through a strategic alliance with Lunit. Deployments are named at the National Cancer Institute, the University of Washington, Nottingham University Hospitals and Source BioScience.

Standards support and a described bidirectional LIS interface with named deployments, short of named LIS integrations a buyer can verify.

BB on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyOptions and residency are stated with isolation or the processing path left open.
Vendor Published

Options stated and the cloud model is unusually specific about ownership, with residency and the management path left open. HALO software can be installed by the laboratory or run under Indica's Cloud Services, which host HALO, HALO AI, HALO Link and HALO AP on Amazon Web Services in deployments the company says are validated by AWS. The cloud page says the customer maintains control over its AWS account while Indica's AWS certified team designs, monitors (with Amazon CloudWatch) and maintains the infrastructure, which places the data in the customer's own tenancy rather than a shared vendor environment. Named cloud deployments include the National Cancer Institute, the University of Washington and the University of Bern's Institute of Tissue Medicine, which the company says was Switzerland's first public health institute to run diagnostic digital pathology in the cloud on AWS.

What is not published is which regions are supported or how the choice is made, and what access Indica's managing team has to the account and from where, which is the processing that could cross a border.

Options stated, with residency implied by the customer's account and the management path left open.

Commercial
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and the posture is discoverable: a buyer can establish how the product is sold and what drives the cost before contacting the vendor. Most of the index sits here.
Vendor Published

No pricing is published for the platform or for algorithms accessed through the store. Total cost includes cleared scanner hardware, the platform and separately licensed algorithms, and because the clearance is scanner specific, hardware choice and software cost are coupled decisions rather than independent ones.

BB on Setting and Specialty CoverageCoverage is named with validation behind part of it.
Vendor Published

A broad cleared viewing scope, with the AI's validated scope unpublished. HALO AP Dx is cleared for primary diagnosis in anatomic pathology with named scanners (Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S360MD, Leica Aperio GT 450 DX) and displays, rather than for one tumor type, and HALO AP is CE-IVDR marked for diagnostic use in Europe, the UK and Switzerland. The company serves clinical laboratories, research institutes, contract research organizations and companion diagnostic development, with named clinical users including the National Cancer Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals and the University of Bern. The AI products name their scope (Breast IHC AI for HER2, ER, PR and Ki67 in invasive breast cancer; Lung PD-L1 AI in non-small cell lung cancer; Prostate AI for detection and Gleason grading in core needle biopsies) and list compatible scanner formats, but no validation population or site is published for them on the product pages.

Coverage named with validation behind the cleared viewing scope.

Tracked Since Listing

What Changed

Material product, regulatory, evidence and commercial changes at Indica Labs, each verified against a live source and tagged to the capability axis it bears on. Funding rounds and awards are not product changes and are not logged.

Sep 22, 2026EHR / interoperability

A Voicebrook VoiceOver PRO integration with the HALO AP platform is now available, adding voice control of case and slide navigation (zoom, pan, annotation, tab switching) and voice ordering of stains and AI analyses. A single command pulls HALO Clinical AI biomarker results such as ER and PR percentages into the matching CAP cancer protocol checklist, and sites that report inside HALO AP can pass results through to the LIS.

Bears on: EHR and Interoperability DepthSource
Aug 17, 2026Product / capability

Indica Labs announced version 4.3 of its HALO, HALO AI, and HALO Link platforms. The release includes a reworked image copy system in HALO for improved workflow flexibility and new features in HALO AI that the vendor says enable more efficient model testing.

Bears on: AI CentralitySource
Our read on these changes →Tracked since Aug 2026
Alternatives

Alternatives to Indica Labs

Vendors in the same categories as Indica Labs whose graded profiles look most alike, with a line on what each product does.

Similar is not the same, so check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Gestalt makes PathFlow, a vendor-neutral digital pathology platform and image management system that brings slides, case and patient information and AI outputs into one workspace, in cloud…

Qritive builds both an image management platform and the AI modules that run in it, and sells the modules into other companies' platforms too.

Digital pathology software company whose Concentriq platform manages, displays and analyzes whole slide pathology images for clinical laboratories and life sciences organizations.

Genius Cervical AI is Hologic's AI for cervical cancer screening.

Deciphex is a Dublin company founded in 2017 by Donal O'Shea, its chief executive, addressing the shortage of pathologists.

AI digital pathology company serving human, veterinary and environmental laboratories since 2013.

Ordered by how closely the graded profiles match across the fifteen axes, inside the same categories. See how each axis is graded in the methodology.

Comparisons

Compared With

Each comparison carries a written verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side. Pairs that cross a category boundary are grouped separately, and their verdicts state where the boundary sits rather than manufacturing a head to head.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

Entry Price Pricing Basis BAA Tier Implementation Source
Contact the vendor
Undisclosed. Enterprise platform licensing plus separately licensed third party algorithms; no rates published. Not published. HIPAA compliance is claimed as a built-in property of HALO AP; no business associate position or agreement is published, including for the managed AWS cloud service. Not disclosed. Deployment is either on the laboratory's infrastructure or under Indica's managed Cloud Services on AWS in an account the customer controls; integration and migration services are sold separately. Cleared use requires a named scanner and display. Vendor Published

No pricing is published, and the cost structure here is unusually coupled: FDA clearance is scanner specific, covering HALO AP Dx with the Hamamatsu NanoZoomer S360MD and the Leica Aperio GT 450 DX, so scanner choice and software licensing are a single decision rather than two. Total cost spans cleared scanner hardware, the platform, and any third party algorithms licensed through the associated store, which carry their own separate regulatory classifications. Buyers should also confirm they are purchasing HALO AP Dx and not HALO AP, since the latter is research use only in the US and not cleared for diagnostic use.