Healthcare Cybersecurity
H

Haystack iS (iatricSystems)

Haystack iS is iatricSystems' patient privacy monitoring software for hospitals and health systems, formerly Security Audit Manager. Iatric Systems, Inc. is a healthcare IT company that sells under its own name and has described itself as an independent business unit of Harris Healthcare. Haystack iS pulls access audit files from the record system, HR platforms and other applications into one place so a privacy team can monitor, investigate and document access to protected health information. Its published integration list names record systems including Epic, Cerner, MEDITECH, NextGen, Allscripts and athenahealth, plus document management, HR, lab, pharmacy and imaging systems, read through an open audit file specification.

Detection runs on Solomon, a machine learning engine iatricSystems built, which learns normal access by role, department, shift and workflow and works alongside expert-written rules and weights the customer can adjust. AVA, the company's virtual assistant, automates follow-up: when an event is flagged it can send the employee a questionnaire, collect the answer and return it to the privacy team. Version 2 was released in 2026 as a rebuild. Version 1.0 holds an ONC health IT certification from April 2021. WVU Medicine and Renown Health are named customers.

No business associate position, security attestation, retention terms, hosting statement or price is published, and nothing says which AVA workflows contact an employee before a person has reviewed the case. Ask for these, and for the false flag rate at your settings.

AI Health Index verifiedSeptember 30, 2026
Compare Haystack iS (iatricSystems) with other vendors
Founded
—
Headquarters
Ponce Inlet, Florida, United States
Website
iatric.com
Categories
healthcare-cybersecurity
Indexed Products
Haystack iS (patient privacy monitoring), Solomon AI detection engine, AVA Advanced Virtual Assistant, Privacy Managed Services
Buyer Segments
Hospitals and health systems, Privacy and compliance officers, HIM and HR teams handling access investigations
Assessment

Capability Axes

An AI Health Index grade measures what a buyer can verify from public sources on the date shown. It is not a rating of how good the product is. A vendor can build an excellent system and grade low on an axis because it publishes nothing an outsider can check. How grades read

AI Capability
BB on AI CentralityThe model is the engine of a core module. The platform carries other value, but this capability does not exist without it.
Vendor Published

The model is the engine of the detection module inside a longer established audit platform. iatricSystems says Haystack iS uses Solomon, "the AI detection engine developed by iatricSystems", and that version 2 "uses machine learning and AI-driven privacy analytics to understand how PHI is typically accessed across your organization", learning normal access by role, department, shift and workflow and weighing several signals, such as access patterns, user roles, relationships and addresses, rather than one.

The October 2025 brochure describes the approach as "combining expert-written rules, advanced machine learning, and expanded AI-driven workflows". Consolidating audit logs from the record system and other applications into one place, investigation tracking and reporting carry value without the model, and the product has run for over two decades, first as Security Audit Manager.

BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelThe oversight structure is described and one part is missing, commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Vendor Published

Oversight is described for detection; the automated contact with staff has no published threshold. The company says a flag "does not automatically mean the access was inappropriate. It means the behavior was different enough to deserve a second look", that the aim is not for AI to make the final decision, and that privacy teams set event weights themselves; incidents can be routed to managers for review, and investigations are documented automatically.

AVA acts on its own: "When a suspicious access occurs, AVA automatically follows up with the user and reports back", and the company describes workflows such as a self-access event triggering a questionnaire that includes the policy and asks the employee to attest they will not repeat the action, with similar workflows for family, neighbor, coworker and VIP access.

Nothing published says which events AVA may contact an employee about before a privacy auditor has looked, whether a person can stop it, or what happens when the contact was wrong. The product page's line that AI "scrutinizes every instance of PHI access" describes uniform processing, not a claim that every call is right.

BB on Model and Technology TransparencyThe approach or the suppliers are named without the version and update discipline behind them. Naming a supplier is the entry to this band both here and on Model Supply Chain Disclosure, which ask different questions of the same disclosure: who receives the data, and what produces the output.
Vendor Published

The approach and the engine are named; model versions and change practice are not. The detection engine is Solomon, built by iatricSystems, which learns each organization's normal access by role, department, shift and workflow and weighs several signals (access patterns, user roles, relationships, addresses) alongside expert-written rules; AVA is the in-house assistant that runs follow-up workflows.

Version 2, launched in 2026, was "rebuilt from the ground up" and lets customers adjust event weights. The ONC certification names Haystack iS version 1.0, certified 26 April 2021. No model version, training data description, accuracy figure or record of when the detection model changes is published.

BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an in house build, a cleared model that cannot be quietly swapped, or a deployment where the transfer does not occur at all. Naming the model provider exits the band below into this one; the axis rises from here on the completeness of the party list and on the terms that govern data once it arrives.
Vendor Published

The chain is structurally short at the model layer: the detection engine is built in house. iatricSystems describes Solomon as "the AI detection engine developed by iatricSystems" and AVA as its own assistant, so no outside model provider is named because none is described.

The ONC certification disclosure lists server and storage hardware, Microsoft server licenses and third party software for certificates, backup and virus protection among the costs of running the product, which describes infrastructure but not who hosts it or where. iatricSystems also sells privacy managed services in which its analysts work inside a customer's program. No subprocessor list is published, and the company's privacy policy does not cover data it processes for customers.

CC on Clinical and Operational EvidenceNamed customers, or vendor reported percentages with no method, denominator or reference standard. Scale of use is recorded here and is not treated as evidence of benefit.
Vendor Published

Named customers without measured outcomes. WVU Medicine, in a 27 February 2024 release marking 14 years with iatricSystems, says Haystack iS replaced separate audit reports across its record, document management, lab and other systems with one audit, and that it now alerts "to only what is more than likely inappropriate access"; it started AVA on self-access review. Renown Health's director of compliance and compliance coordinator are quoted on AVA reducing their workload.

The company states more than 1,300 hospitals as customers across its products. No count of events, false positive rate, investigation time or confirmed incidents is published, and no independent evaluation of the detection engine is published.

DD on AI Safety and PHI StewardshipNothing published on how protected information moves through the system.
Vendor Published

Nothing is published on how Haystack iS handles the protected information it gathers. The product joins access logs from the record system with HR records and third party applications, so it holds who opened which patient's record alongside each employee's role, department and shift. iatricSystems' June 2026 blog tells healthcare teams to understand how AI tools handle PHI, where data flows, whether it is retained or shared and whether a business associate agreement is in place, but it does not answer those questions for Haystack iS.

The company's privacy policy, updated 11 February 2026, covers its website and says it does not apply when iatricSystems processes personal data on behalf of a customer. No retention period, training use or de-identification statement for customer data is published, and nothing covers guardrails or how a safety event is handled.

Regulatory and Compliance
DD on HIPAA and BAA PostureNo statement of status and no privacy document that reaches the product. Both halves are absent at this grade: a service level privacy document on its own lifts a vendor to the band above even where no status is stated. A website privacy notice, including one that says it does not cover customer data, does not reach the product, so a vendor whose only document is that notice and who states no status grades here.
Vendor Published

No business associate status and no privacy document that reaches the product. Haystack iS exists to help a covered entity meet HIPAA's audit obligations: it consolidates PHI access logs, supports risk assessments and OCR-ready documentation, and its product page says reporting fields can be aligned to HIPAA requirements.

That is the customer's compliance, not the vendor's own position. iatricSystems' privacy policy, updated 11 February 2026, covers the website and states that it does not apply when the company processes personal data on behalf of a customer, and no page states business associate status or offers an agreement. The company's own blog tells buyers to check whether an agreement is in place with AI vendors.

CC on Security Certifications and Trust CenterControls are described with an outside check behind them, such as independent penetration testing on a stated cadence, but no attestation against a recognized framework. A certification that tests the software security features rather than the vendor operations, such as federal health IT certification, is an outside check of this kind.
Regulatory Filing

An outside check of the software's security features, with no audit of how the company operates. Haystack iS version 1.0 is an ONC certified health IT module (certification 15.05.05.2760.HSiS.01.00.0.210426, 26 April 2021) whose tested criteria include authentication, access control and authorization, audit reports, automatic access time-out, encrypted authentication credentials and multi-factor authentication. That tests the product's security features, not the vendor's operations.

No SOC 2 report, ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, HITRUST certification, penetration test statement or trust center is published for iatricSystems or Haystack iS, and version 2, rebuilt in 2026, is not shown as certified. The platform holds a consolidated record of who looked at which patient, joined to HR data.

BB on FDA and Regulatory StatusThe pathway is stated and in progress, or a clearance is named without the vintage and scope a buyer needs to match it to the product on offer.
Regulatory Filing

No device claim, and a credential under the health IT regime. Haystack iS is privacy monitoring software for covered entities, with no FDA clearance and none claimed. Version 1.0 is certified under the ONC Health IT Certification Program (15.05.05.2760.HSiS.01.00.0.210426, certified 26 April 2021, criteria 170.315(b)(10), (d)(1), (d)(3), (d)(5), (d)(12), (d)(13), (g)(4) and (g)(5)), with iatricSystems publishing the certification, disclosures and cost types as the program requires.

The product is built around HIPAA audit duties and OCR audit readiness for the customer. The certification names version 1.0, and nothing says whether version 2, launched in 2026 as a rebuild, carries it.

CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence is committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it. Most of the index sits here.
Vendor Published

Responsible use is stated in plain terms, with no evaluation behind it. iatricSystems says a flag means behavior differed enough to deserve a second look rather than that access was inappropriate, that normal varies by role, department, shift and workflow so one-size-fits-all monitoring is wrong, that human judgment stays at the center, and that customers set event weights themselves. No governance framework, model evaluation or outside review is published.

The people the model scores are employees, and a false flag can bring an automated questionnaire and an investigation, but no false flag rate is published overall or by role, department, shift or length of service, which is where a baseline model is most likely to mistake new or changed work for misconduct.

CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms exist that let someone challenge an output, such as audit trails, source traceability or review before commit, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the harmed party.
Vendor Published

Mechanisms let a privacy team examine a flag before acting; nothing stands behind the output and the flagged employee has no route. Haystack iS shows auditors related access history, prior investigations and user and patient activity for each event, documents investigations automatically, and records AVA's questionnaires and responses.

No accuracy, precision or false positive figure is published, and the product page's "Remove False Positives" and "false positives are minimized" are unquantified. Nothing commits iatricSystems to a remedy when a flag is wrong, and no published route lets an employee who was flagged or contacted by AVA see the basis or challenge it.

Integration and Deployment
BB on EHR and Interoperability DepthNamed systems with read access or one directional writing, or standards support with named deployments behind it.
Vendor Published

Named record systems with read access, in production. Haystack iS reads audit files: its vendor integrations list names Cerner, Epic, MEDITECH, NextGen, HealthQuest, Allscripts, Athena, CompleteCare and Medhost among record systems, Hyland, Perceptive/ImageNow and Open4 for document management, ADP, Ceridian, Infor, Kronos, Lawson, PeopleSoft, SAP Payroll, Workday, Paylocity and UltiPro for HR, Sunquest for lab, McKesson, Medicon, Omnicell and Pyxis for pharmacy, and GE, Philips iSite, Sectra, Siemens, Carestream, Fuji, NovaRAD and Penrad for imaging, through an open audit file import specification, with an offer to build for unlisted systems. WVU Medicine consolidated its record, document management and lab audit trails in it. The connections are one way: the product consumes audit files and does not write back to the record.

CC on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyA single hosted option with location implied rather than committed.
Vendor Published

One deployment described only through its costs. The ONC certification disclosure says the product "requires server and data storage resources" and lists server and storage hardware, Microsoft server operating system and database licenses and third party software for certificates, backup and virus protection as costs, and asks buyers to consult iatricSystems on server requirements, which reads as infrastructure on the customer's side. The October 2025 brochure repeats the hardware note. No page states a hosted option, a location where the consolidated audit and HR data rests, or whether iatricSystems or its managed services analysts reach it remotely.

Commercial
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and the posture is discoverable: a buyer can establish how the product is sold and what drives the cost before contacting the vendor. Most of the index sits here.
Vendor Published

No price, and the cost drivers are published. The ONC cost disclosure for Haystack iS lists the costs a buyer carries beyond the license: server and storage hardware, Microsoft server licensing, third party software for certificates, backup and virus protection, and interface costs charged by the third party vendors whose systems feed it. The license price and its unit are not published, and the product page routes to a demo request. Privacy managed services, with iatricSystems analysts working a customer's privacy program, are sold alongside it.

BB on Setting and Specialty CoverageCoverage is named with validation behind part of it.
Vendor Published

Coverage is named, with validation behind part of it. Haystack iS is sold to hospital and health system privacy and compliance officers for monitoring access to protected health information across the record system, document management, lab, imaging, pharmacy and HR applications, and iatricSystems also offers the monitoring as a managed service. Named deployments are WVU Medicine, which has worked with the company for 14 years, and Renown Health. The product page offers it to organizations of any size; no page shows which settings beyond acute hospitals, such as clinics or physician groups, run it.

Alternatives

Alternatives to Haystack iS (iatricSystems)

Vendors in the same categories as Haystack iS (iatricSystems) whose graded profiles look most alike, with a line on what each product does.

Similar is not the same, so check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

Cylera sells an IoT asset intelligence and security platform that began in hospitals and now also serves finance, higher education, transportation, manufacturing and energy.

Finite State sells a product security platform to makers of connected devices, including medical device manufacturers, automotive, energy, industrial and government suppliers.

Medcrypt sells cybersecurity compliance software and services to medical device manufacturers rather than to hospitals.

Medication and compliance intelligence company whose two surveillance products watch hospital staff for insider risk: ControlCheck, formerly Bluesight for Controlled Substances, for drug…

Censinet sells Censinet RiskOps, a risk management platform built for hospitals and health systems.

ORDR (formerly styled Ordr) sells connected device security for healthcare, manufacturing, finance, government and other sectors, built around turning device intelligence into enforced…

Ordered by how closely the graded profiles match across the fifteen axes, inside the same categories. See how each axis is graded in the methodology.

Comparisons

Compared With

Each comparison carries a written verdict, the buyer conditions that favor each vendor, and a graded side by side. Pairs that cross a category boundary are grouped separately, and their verdicts state where the boundary sits rather than manufacturing a head to head.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

Entry Price Pricing Basis BAA Tier Implementation Source
Not published
Not published. The ONC cost disclosure lists the costs a buyer carries beyond the license: server and storage hardware, Microsoft server licensing, third party software, and interface costs from source system vendors. Not published. No business associate status or agreement is stated. Not published. Third party interface costs from the source system vendors are the customer's, per the ONC cost disclosure. Vendor Published

No license price or unit is published; the product page routes to a demo request. What is published is the cost disclosure iatricSystems posts for its ONC certification: the product needs server and storage resources, Microsoft server operating system and database licenses, third party software for digital certificates, backup and virus protection, and the source system vendors may charge for the interfaces that feed it.

Three things to settle. The license unit, since facility, bed, monitored user and connected system pricing behave very differently for a product whose value grows with the number of systems it reads. Whether new integrations built for your systems are included. And, if you consider the privacy managed service, what analyst time it buys.