Conveyor AI by Mobius MD

The ambient generation is genuine model work, but the company's patented asset and the reason clinicians choose it are not AI. Mobius MD's differentiator is the Conveyor pairing technology, a connectivity invention from 2017 that lets a phone type into any computer without software installation, and the AI scribe was layered onto it afterwards. That is the moat is not the model pattern this index has applied to Haystack and Armis: strip out the ambient AI and a valuable universal dictation business remains, which is not true of the pure plays here.

Conventional draft and review with a structural gate similar to River Records: because output is streamed to wherever the clinician has placed the cursor rather than written into the record through an integration, a clinician is necessarily present and in the document at the moment text arrives. Nothing files itself. Held at B because no acceptance rate, edit burden figure or confidence threshold is published, and because generating 80 percent of a note quickly says nothing about how much of the remaining review burden is correction.

The headline figure measures completeness rather than correctness: more than 80 percent of the note generated within 60 seconds says how much text arrives and how fast, not how much of it is right. Specialty specific models are referenced without being described, and no accuracy figure, model card, named model or evaluation methodology was located. Mild credit for a public blog that discusses how ambient scribes work and where they fall short, though that is category education rather than disclosure about this product.

Named clinician testimonials across orthopaedic surgery, internal medicine, family practice, emergency and telemedicine, plus ten verified clients recorded on a third party marketplace listing. No study, controlled comparison, accuracy benchmark or independent evaluation located. Graded C on the standing precedent that testimony and client counts are not evidence of benefit.

Claims to exceed the standards specified by HIPAA and HITECH, which is an assertion rather than a control. What lends it some weight is a concrete and costly design decision: the product requires an iOS device and supports no Android path at all, which the company attributes directly to its security requirements. Giving up an entire mobile platform is an unusual thing to do for security theatre, so the constraint reads as real. No retention schedule, de identification practice or training use statement was located.

States compliance with HIPAA and HITECH, the latter being a reference few vendors in this category make explicitly. Business associate agreement terms are not published for inspection before contracting.

Not assessed. No named or dated attestation and no trust centre located in this pass, despite security being invoked as the reason for a significant product constraint.

Not a regulated medical device and none claimed or required for ambient documentation and dictation.

Nothing located. No fairness statement, subgroup analysis or accent and dialect performance disclosure, and no language coverage is claimed either. For a product whose lineage is medical dictation, where accent handling has been a known weakness of incumbent speech recognition for decades, this is a gap worth pressing.

Universal by mechanism rather than by integration, which is a real distinction a buyer should understand. Patented pairing lets an iOS device stream text into any application on any Mac or Windows computer with nothing installed, so it works with every EMR including Epic, Cerner and MEDITECH without an integration project, and a clinician moving between hospitals, systems or employers keeps their profile, templates and preferences. That portability is a genuine anti lock in argument almost nobody else in this category makes. The limits are equally real: text lands at the cursor, so there is no structured field population, no chart context flowing in and no write back, and integrates in third party listings should be read as works alongside rather than connects to.

Not assessed. Cloud processing with an iOS capture device and no installed desktop software, but no hosting region, residency detail or sub processor information was located.

More transparent than most and not fully published. A seven day free trial with full feature access is offered, the company states there are no costs or surprise fees and that features other platforms charge extra for are included, and roughly 149 US dollars a month is cited for unlimited premium dictation. Held at B because that figure appears in the vendor's own blog rather than a rate card, and pricing for the AI scribe tier and enterprise options is described as layered on top without being stated, so a buyer evaluating the ambient product specifically still cannot see the number.

Broad by user base rather than by enumeration, with documented use across orthopaedic surgery, internal medicine, family practice, emergency department, inpatient and telemedicine, and a dictation heritage that covers operative notes as well as office visits. Customisable templates and phrase libraries carry per clinician. Two bounds: an iOS device is mandatory, and no language coverage beyond English was located.