CarePilot

CarePilot is the intelligence layer rather than a platform carrying one. A listed software group contracted it specifically to supply AI capability across an EHR it already owned, which is the clearest possible evidence that the model work is the product. This is the counterpart to the C graded on EverHealth Scribe: same intelligence, but here it belongs to the vendor rather than being licensed in.

Not assessed for the direct product. Review and approval behaviour is described for the EverHealth Scribe deployment, but this index does not transfer a claim from a distribution partner's materials onto the supplier's own record. Ask what the review gate looks like when CarePilot is contracted directly through the marketplace rather than consumed inside the EHR.

No accuracy figure, model card, named models, architecture description or evaluation methodology was located for CarePilot under its own name. Everything publicly documented about its performance arrives through its distribution partner's announcements rather than from the company itself.

Two operating figures exist and their provenance is unusual enough to describe precisely. Practices using the embedded product are reported to have eliminated an average of eight minutes of documentation time per visit, with a 32 percent increase in same day claim submissions, and both are explicitly attributed to CarePilot data in a listed company's press release. A public company putting its name to a partner's numbers is a modest step above an unattributed vendor claim, since it carries securities disclosure exposure. It remains vendor derived with no denominator, cohort, time period or methodology, and no study or independent assessment was located.

Not assessed, and this is the highest value gap in the record. No statement on audio or transcript retention, de identification or training use was located under CarePilot's own name. The question matters in both directions: practices buying direct need it answered, and practices using EverHealth Scribe need to know that patient audio reaches a third party at all, which the EHR branding does not make obvious.

Not assessed. No published business associate agreement posture was located. For the embedded route, establish whether the BAA chain reaches CarePilot as a subcontractor and on what terms.

Not assessed. No named or dated attestation and no trust centre located in this pass.

Not a regulated medical device and none claimed or required for ambient documentation.

Nothing located. No fairness statement, subgroup analysis or accent and dialect disclosure under the company's own name.

Narrow and properly documented, which is better than broad and asserted. CarePilot holds its own listing in the DrChrono Marketplace and the authorisation mechanism is described concretely: clinicians sign in with their DrChrono credentials to authorise the integration, and each provider at a practice authorises individually. Per provider authorisation is a meaningful detail because it means access is granted and revoked at the clinician level rather than the practice level. No integration with any EHR other than DrChrono was located.

Not assessed. Cloud delivered with a browser based application, but no hosting region, residency option or sub processor detail was located.

No published rate card for the direct product and no statement on how the embedded route is priced. A practice on DrChrono may be able to reach the same intelligence two ways, through the marketplace listing or through EverHealth Scribe, and neither price is public, so the comparison cannot currently be made.

Not assessed. No specialty count, note format list, setting coverage or language support was located under CarePilot's own name. Its reach is bounded in practice by the DrChrono base, which serves independent ambulatory practices.