Remote Monitoring & Chronic Care
A

AliveCor

AliveCor makes ECG devices and the AI that interprets them. Its flagship, Kardia 12L, is a pocket sized system that acquires a 12 lead ECG through a single cable and five electrodes, with KAI 12L, a set of deep neural networks cleared separately from the device, measuring and interpreting the recording for clinicians in offices, hospitals and acute settings, as an adjunct a physician must review.

KAI 12L was cleared in June 2024 with 35 determinations and in January 2026 with 39, among them acute myocardial infarction, which the company describes as the first cleared AI to detect a heart attack from a reduced leadset; its filing names about 1 million ECGs from Emory University Hospital (1985 to 2010) as training data. The company began with KardiaMobile personal ECG devices sold to consumers and reports more than 3 million lifetime users in more than 40 countries and more than 200 clinical publications.

Kardia 12L is used in more than 250 US practices and in India, Australia and New Zealand, with European review under way, and Medicare payment for outpatient use was approved in 2025. In September 2026 the company launched KardiaACCESS under the CMS ACCESS Model, offering eligible Medicare beneficiaries connected devices and clinician guided care for blood pressure, diabetes and heart health at no out of pocket cost. Based in Mountain View, California, and led by chief executive Priya Abani.

AI Health Index verifiedSeptember 27, 2026
Compare AliveCor with other vendors
Founded
2011
Headquarters
Mountain View, California, United States
Website
alivecor.com
Categories
remote-monitoring, diagnostics-and-genomics
Indexed Products
Kardia 12L, KAI 12L, KardiaMobile 6L, KardiaStation, KardiaComplete, KardiaCare Plus, KardiaACCESS
Buyer Segments
Physician Practice, Health System, Consumer
Assessment

Capability Axes

An AI Health Index grade measures what a buyer can verify from public sources on the date shown. It is not a rating of how good the product is. A vendor can build an excellent system and grade low on an axis because it publishes nothing an outsider can check. How grades read

AI Capability
BB on AI CentralityThe model is the engine of a core module. The platform carries other value, but this capability does not exist without it.
Regulatory Filing

Deep neural networks are the engine of the interpretation, and the devices record ECGs a clinician can read without them. The home page leads with Kardia 12L, "the easiest way to acquire a 12-lead ECG", a pocket sized system using a single cable and five electrodes; the device is cleared as an electrocardiograph in its own right, and the interpretation software, marketed as KAI 12L, is cleared separately and uses several deep neural networks to measure and interpret resting ECGs across rhythm, morphology and interval determinations, including acute myocardial infarction.

The company also sells KardiaMobile personal ECG devices, provider software (KardiaStation, KardiaComplete) and the KardiaCare Plus subscription, and reports more than 3 million lifetime users. Remove the models and the devices still produce tracings, so the models are the engine of a core module rather than the whole product.

BB on Autonomy and Oversight ModelThe oversight structure is described and one part is missing, commonly the threshold at which the system stops or what happens after it is wrong.
Regulatory Filing

The oversight rule is published in the cleared indication, and the highest stakes determination lacks its operating detail. The current interpretation software (K252589) assists a healthcare professional in measuring and interpreting resting ECGs, is used by professionals or trained personnel in offices, hospitals and acute settings, and its analyses are an adjunct that must be reviewed by a qualified physician.

What is missing is how the system presents uncertainty: nothing describes confidence reporting for a myocardial infarction determination, how borderline or poor quality recordings are flagged, or whether a conventional 12 lead confirmation is advised before acting, in acute and unconventional settings where the staff acting first may not be cardiologists. KardiaMobile personal devices return determinations to patients directly, and nothing published says what a patient is told to do with an abnormal result.

BB on Model and Technology TransparencyThe approach or the suppliers are named without the version and update discipline behind them. Naming a supplier is the entry to this band both here and on Model Supply Chain Disclosure, which ask different questions of the same disclosure: who receives the data, and what produces the output.
Regulatory Filing

The approach, training data and cleared scope are stated, without performance figures. The current 510(k) summary (K252589) describes several deep neural networks trained on about 1 million 12 lead ECGs from about 400,000 patients at Emory University Hospital between 1985 and 2010, with the training population's sex, age and race composition, performing rhythm, morphology and interval analysis.

The company enumerates its 39 determinations, including acute myocardial infarction, and the clearance sequence (Corvair in June 2024, Corvair Monza in January 2026) marks versions. The Kardia 12L acquisition design, a single cable and five electrodes, is described.

What is missing is performance, since no sensitivity, specificity or PPV is published for any determination, and a description of how the models handle the reduced electrode set relative to a conventional ten electrode placement.

BB on Model Supply Chain DisclosureSubstantial partial disclosure, or a chain that is structurally short: an in house build, a cleared model that cannot be quietly swapped, or a deployment where the transfer does not occur at all. Naming the model provider exits the band below into this one; the axis rises from here on the completeness of the party list and on the terms that govern data once it arrives.
Regulatory Filing

The model chain is structurally short: the interpretation models are AliveCor's own, cleared in its name (K231010, K252589) so they cannot be quietly swapped, and their training source is named in the filing as about 1 million ECGs from Emory University Hospital recorded between 1985 and 2010.

No hosting provider, subprocessor list or third party component is named for the consumer or clinical lines, and the agreement under which the Emory data was used is not described; recipients of data may be listed in the privacy policy. The interpretation software is cleared separately from the device and can work with other compatible hardware, which draws the model boundary explicitly.

BB on Clinical and Operational EvidenceNamed deployments with dated outcome figures and enough method to test them, or published research short of independent validation.
Vendor Published

Published research and deployment figures, short of published diagnostic accuracy for the lead product. The home page cites more than 200 clinical publications and more than 3 million lifetime users in more than 40 countries, largely built on the KardiaMobile personal devices.

For Kardia 12L and its interpretation software, the company has reported a peer reviewed study in Heart Rhythm O2 finding a 29 percent reduction in ECG acquisition time, a workflow result, use in more than 250 US practices with expansion to India, Australia and New Zealand, more than 4,000 identified cases of myocardial infarction and ischemia, and Medicare payment for hospital outpatient use approved in 2025.

The current 510(k) summary (K252589) reports that sensitivity, specificity and PPV were tested with no figures. The headline claims, the easiest 12 lead acquisition and heart attack detection from a reduced leadset, are answered on workflow and not on accuracy: detections counted are not misses measured.

CC on AI Safety and PHI StewardshipGeneral assurances of privacy and security that do not answer the questions artificial intelligence raises: what is retained, what reaches a model, and what happens to it there.
Vendor Published

The training data's source is named and the terms that govern patient data are not published. The company's 510(k) summary (K252589) names Emory University Hospital as the source of about 1 million training ECGs recorded between 1985 and 2010; the data use agreement, deidentification standard and research authorization behind that transfer are not described.

The company's privacy policy may state how ECGs recorded on its personal devices and clinical products are retained and whether they inform model development. The consumer line matters here: people recording their own ECGs on KardiaMobile generate data governed by consumer privacy law rather than HIPAA, where secondary use varies widely, and the company reports more than 3 million lifetime users. No retention, training use or deidentification position is stated elsewhere, and no safety engineering is published.

Regulatory and Compliance
DD on HIPAA and BAA PostureNo statement of status and no privacy document that reaches the product. Both halves are absent at this grade: a service level privacy document on its own lifts a vendor to the band above even where no status is stated. A website privacy notice, including one that says it does not cover customer data, does not reach the product, so a vendor whose only document is that notice and who states no status grades here.
Vendor Published

No HIPAA position is stated on the company's home page, though the privacy policy may give one. The data governance shape is unusual: KardiaMobile recordings made by consumers outside a clinical relationship fall under consumer privacy law rather than HIPAA, while Kardia 12L studies and provider software run inside provider relationships, so identical ECG data is governed differently by product, and nothing published on the pages available explains how the company separates the two or what happens when a consumer shares recordings with a physician. KardiaACCESS, launched in September 2026 under the CMS ACCESS Model, adds clinician guided care for Medicare beneficiaries, which carries its own HIPAA obligations.

DD on Security Certifications and Trust CenterControls are asserted with nothing independent behind them, or nothing is published. Read the note before concluding anything: this is the grade most often corrected on a second pass, because assurance material frequently sits on a parent domain or inside an old announcement rather than on the product pages.
Vendor Published

No security certification, testing statement or disclosure route is named on the company's home page, and its security page (alivecor.com/security) is where one would be stated. The attack surface includes a consumer element: personal ECG devices pair wirelessly with patients' own phones running the Kardia app, a device class with a documented history of pairing, firmware and app weaknesses and specific FDA guidance, alongside clinical systems used in acute settings whose determinations inform urgent treatment. Premarket cybersecurity documentation exists for cleared connected devices and is reviewed by regulators rather than published for customers.

AA on FDA and Regulatory StatusThe regulatory position is unambiguous and verifiable: a clearance or authorization identifiable in the public databases, with the version and indication it actually covers.
Regulatory Filing

The regulatory position is identifiable and matches what is sold. FDA's database lists AliveCor clearances on 7 June 2024 for Corvair (K231010, product code MHX, ECG analysis) and Impala (K232035, DPS, an electrocardiograph), and on 9 January 2026 for Corvair Monza (K252589, MHX, with K231010 as predicate); the dates match the company's announcements of dual clearance for the KAI 12L interpretation software and the Kardia 12L device in June 2024 with 35 determinations, and of a further clearance in January 2026 adding short PR interval, atrial and ventricular bigeminy and left and right axial deviation to reach 39.

The database lists them under those development names, so a buyer matching KAI 12L to its clearance needs the company's statement or the date. The current indication assists a healthcare professional in measuring and interpreting resting diagnostic ECGs in offices, hospitals and acute settings, as an adjunct that a qualified physician must review, which matches the clinical positioning. KardiaMobile personal devices carry their own earlier clearances.

CC on AI Governance and Bias DisclosureResponsible artificial intelligence is committed to in policy language with no evaluation behind it. Most of the index sits here.
Regulatory Filing

The training population is characterized in the company's filing and no performance by group is published. The 510(k) summary for the current version of the 12 lead interpretation software (K252589, cleared 9 January 2026) says its deep neural networks were trained on about 1 million 12 lead ECGs from about 400,000 patients at Emory University Hospital recorded between 1985 and 2010, 52 percent male and 48 percent female, mean age 61, 56 percent white, 33 percent African American, 2.2 percent Asian and 9 percent other, and that performance was tested with sensitivity, specificity and PPV, with no figures and no results by sex, age, race or body habitus.

A single US academic center's ECGs from before 2011 is the population the models learned from, while the product is sold into acute and unconventional settings in the United States, India, Australia and New Zealand. Two exposures bear on it: electrode contact with five electrodes varies with body habitus, chest hair, breast tissue and skin, and infarction presentation in women is more often missed in cardiac care.

CC on AI Liability and RecourseMechanisms exist that let someone challenge an output, such as audit trails, source traceability or review before commit, with nothing standing behind the output and no route for the harmed party.
Regulatory Filing

A physician review requirement is part of the cleared use, and nothing stands behind the output. The current interpretation software's indication (K252589) says its analyses are an adjunct to clinical history, symptoms and other tests and must be reviewed by a qualified physician, so a clinician can challenge a determination before acting.

The summary states that sensitivity, specificity and PPV were assessed and performance is substantially equivalent to the predicate, but publishes no figures for any determination, including acute myocardial infarction or atrial fibrillation, so no error rate is on the record. No accuracy commitment, indemnity or remediation position is published.

A false negative infarction determination in an acute setting can delay escalation and a false positive can activate a catheterization lab; nothing says how a clinician should weigh a negative result in a symptomatic patient or a determination made on a poor recording. KardiaMobile personal devices return determinations to patients with no clinician in the loop.

Integration and Deployment
CC on EHR and Interoperability DepthIntegration is claimed through standards or a middleware layer with no system named and nothing to verify.
Vendor Published

One interoperability property is documented and record integration is not described. The interpretation software is cleared separately from the Kardia 12L electrocardiograph, and the company has said it can work with other compatible acquisition devices, so the model is not tied to one piece of hardware. Studies reach clinicians through the company's provider software, and Medicare billing for outpatient studies implies documentation reaching a record and a claim.

No electronic health record, standard (such as HL7 or DICOM ECG), API or marketplace listing is named, and nothing describes whether a completed study arrives in the chart as a document, discrete coded findings or a standard ECG file, including from ambulances, rural clinics and care homes where the company markets the device, or how a patient's own KardiaMobile recordings reach their physician.

DD on Deployment Model and Data ResidencyNothing published about where the system runs or where the data rests.
Vendor Published

Nothing published says where the system runs or where recordings rest. Personal devices pair with patients' own phones and recordings typically sync to an account; the clinical system's studies reach clinicians through provider software (KardiaStation, KardiaComplete). Where the interpretation executes (on the device, the phone or a cloud service), which hosting provider holds recordings, and in which region, is not stated, though the company's privacy policy may set out those terms.

The clinical system is sold in the United States, India, Australia and New Zealand, with European review under way, and India's data protection law and European transfer rules bear on where health data sits. For a device used to detect myocardial infarction in acute settings, whether a determination depends on connectivity is operationally material and unstated.

Commercial
CC on Commercial TransparencyNo price is published and the posture is discoverable: a buyer can establish how the product is sold and what drives the cost before contacting the vendor. Most of the index sits here.
Vendor Published

No price is published for the product the record leads with, and how it is paid for is discoverable. For Kardia 12L, the company has reported Medicare payment approval for hospital outpatient use in 2025, which is what the payer pays the provider for a study, not what a practice pays AliveCor, and it publishes a purchasing route for providers; no device, software, per study or subscription price is published.

In September 2026 it launched KardiaACCESS under the CMS ACCESS Model, giving eligible Original Medicare beneficiaries clinician guided care and connected devices for blood pressure, diabetes and heart health at no out of pocket cost, which settles the patient's cost, not the buyer's. KardiaMobile personal devices are retail products, a side line to the Kardia 12L clinical system.

BB on Setting and Specialty CoverageCoverage is named with validation behind part of it.
Regulatory Filing

Coverage is named from home to acute care, with validation behind part of it. The current interpretation software (K252589) is indicated for the general population, from healthy subjects to patients with cardiac and non cardiac abnormalities, in offices, hospitals and acute settings; KardiaMobile personal devices are cleared for people recording their own rhythm at home, and KardiaACCESS (September 2026) brings connected devices and clinician guided care to Medicare beneficiaries for blood pressure, diabetes and heart health.

The company markets Kardia 12L for ambulances, rural clinics, care homes and field settings, and sells it in the United States, India, Australia and New Zealand. Validation stands behind part of this: the clearances and the company's research on its personal devices, but no published accuracy figures for the 12 lead determinations and nothing validating the unconventional settings or populations outside the US academic training data.

Tracked Since Listing

Product updates

Material product, regulatory, evidence and commercial changes at AliveCor, each verified against a live source and tagged to the capability axis it bears on. Funding rounds and awards are not product changes and are not logged.

Sep 15, 2026Product / capability

AliveCor launched KardiaACCESS, its program under the CMS ACCESS Model, the 10 year Medicare initiative for technology supported chronic care. Eligible Original Medicare beneficiaries get clinician guided care and AliveCor's connected devices for managing blood pressure, diabetes and heart health, at no out of pocket cost.

Bears on: Commercial TransparencySource
Our read on this update →Tracked since Sep 2026
Alternatives

Alternatives to AliveCor

Vendors in the same categories as AliveCor whose graded profiles look most alike, with a line on what each product does.

Similar is not the same, so check that each one does the job you need. No vendor pays for placement.

iRhythm runs Zio, a long term ambulatory cardiac monitoring service.

Hinge Health runs a digital musculoskeletal program for employers and health plans, delivered through an app and a care team of physical therapists, physicians and health coaches working…

Nanowear weaves the sensors into clothing.

Biofourmis monitors patients at home and tries to detect deterioration before it becomes an admission.

AI enabled chronic care management for older adults, run in partnership with health systems: AI agents monitor daily vitals from connected devices in patients' homes and handle medication…

Cureety sells an oncology remote monitoring platform that turns patient reported symptoms into toxicity levels aligned with CTCAE and prioritizes the patients who need attention between visits.

Ordered by how closely the graded profiles match across the fifteen axes, inside the same categories. See how each axis is graded in the methodology.

Commercial

Pricing

Vendor-published figures are labeled as such. Figures labeled “Estimated” are derived from third-party sources and have not been confirmed by the vendor.

Entry Price Pricing Basis BAA Tier Implementation Source
Kardia 12L pricing not published; consumer devices sold at retail
Kardia 12L price not published (provider purchasing route; Medicare outpatient payment approved in 2025); consumer devices sold at retail; KardiaACCESS at no out of pocket cost to eligible Medicare beneficiaries Not published Not published; Medicare payment approved for hospital outpatient use in 2025 Vendor Published

No price is published for Kardia 12L, the clinical system the company leads with: no device, software, per study, subscription or volume terms, though a purchasing route for providers exists. The company reported Medicare payment approval for Kardia 12L in hospital outpatient settings in 2025, which is what Medicare pays the provider per study, not what a practice pays AliveCor.

KardiaMobile personal ECG devices are retail products bought directly by consumers, a side line to the clinical system. In September 2026 the company launched KardiaACCESS under the CMS ACCESS Model, giving eligible Original Medicare beneficiaries connected devices and clinician guided care at no out of pocket cost. Whether the interpretation software is licensed separately when used with other compatible devices is not stated. Ask for the Kardia 12L price or per study fee, subscription terms, and KardiaACCESS terms for clinicians and payers.