AI Health Index
Vendors · Behavioral Health AI · Aiberry
A

Aiberry pricing

One tier carries a figure, which is enough to size the entry cost before contact.

Aiberry full profileAiberry alternatives
Pricing terms

How Aiberry pricing works

Pricing model
Per organization per year, published by the vendor for the entry tier only. Digital MindCare is $5,000 a year, described as simple pricing without contracts or usage limits, covering twelve established screenings, analytics and reporting, routing to support, expedited crisis referral and Spanish availability. Smart AI MindCare, the voice and visual assessment tier, is quoted; it adds the voice screening experience, advanced analytics, a custom URL and five demographic questions. A custom enterprise tier covering clinical solutions, custom implementation and integration, and workflow automation is also quoted. No self serve route exists at any tier: sales run through a demo booking form.
Implementation
None published, and the absence of setup is presented as a selling point. The company states that most organizations start quickly with minimal effort, that a customized link and resources are configured typically within a few business days, and that no complex integrations or training are required. That is consistent with the architecture: an anonymous, login free screening reached through a per organization URL needs no provisioning and no record system interface. The quoted enterprise tier lists custom implementation and integration with no fee position attached, and that is the only place a cost would sit.
Business associate agreement
Not addressed anywhere. HIPAA compliance is represented by a footer badge with no attestation, assessor or scope statement, and HIPAA has no certifying body. No business associate agreement template, execution requirement, statement of which entity contracts or subcontractor flow down position is published. The question matters most at the quoted enterprise tier, where clinical solutions are offered and an identified record is implied, and that is the tier with the least published detail. Separately, behavioral health and recovery centers are one of four marketed settings and drug and alcohol screening is among the instruments offered, which places substance use disorder records under a federal confidentiality regime with its own consent and redisclosure rules that a standard agreement does not satisfy. Nothing published engages it.

The annual organizational license with no usage cap is the structurally important fact. For a screening product deployed across a student body, a workforce or a facility population, the absence of a per screening meter is what decides whether the cost is predictable, and the company states it plainly.

The cost of the product the company is actually known for is not published. The voice and visual assessment is the validated technology, the subject of the peer reviewed study and the reason a buyer would choose this vendor over a form, and it is quoted rather than priced. So the published figure covers the tier with no machine learning in it, and the tier with the machine learning requires a conversation.

Four buyer settings compound the remaining uncertainty. A correctional facility, a university counseling service, a corporate wellness administrator and a recovery center have different budget structures, procurement routes and volume profiles, and nothing indicates whether the annual license holds across all four or whether population size moves it.

No return proxy is published. The commercial argument is early engagement against a provider shortage, supported by a claim that one in five screenings leads to an action, with no cost per screening or throughput figure attached. What the clinical enterprise tier includes and the minimum commitment by setting are not published either.

Compared on price

Aiberry pricing against its alternatives

Published prices for Aiberry and the products closest to it. Each figure is as the vendor publishes it, in its own currency and billing unit.

All Aiberry alternatives →

Questions

Aiberry pricing, answered

How much does Aiberry cost?

One tier carries a figure, which is enough to size the entry cost before contact. The annual organizational license with no usage cap is the structurally important fact. For a screening product deployed across a student body, a workforce or a facility population, the absence of a per screening meter is what decides whether the cost is predictable, and the company states it plainly.

Does Aiberry charge an implementation fee?

None published, and the absence of setup is presented as a selling point. The company states that most organizations start quickly with minimal effort, that a customized link and resources are configured typically within a few business days, and that no complex integrations or training are required. That is consistent with the architecture: an anonymous, login free screening reached through a per organization URL needs no provisioning and no record system interface. The quoted enterprise tier lists custom implementation and integration with no fee position attached, and that is the only place a cost would sit.

Does Aiberry offer a business associate agreement?

Not addressed anywhere. HIPAA compliance is represented by a footer badge with no attestation, assessor or scope statement, and HIPAA has no certifying body. No business associate agreement template, execution requirement, statement of which entity contracts or subcontractor flow down position is published. The question matters most at the quoted enterprise tier, where clinical solutions are offered and an identified record is implied, and that is the tier with the least published detail. Separately, behavioral health and recovery centers are one of four marketed settings and drug and alcohol screening is among the instruments offered, which places substance use disorder records under a federal confidentiality regime with its own consent and redisclosure rules that a standard agreement does not satisfy. Nothing published engages it.