Mercy and Aidoc released a white paper, commissioned by AVIA, reporting on five months of AI deployment across the Mercy health system. The review documents more than 50,000 new clinical findings surfaced in that window and tracks the associated changes in speed of diagnosis and time to treatment. The scale is the notable part: this is a multi hospital deployment reporting aggregate output rather than a single site pilot.
Our readA five month figure from a named health system gives buyers something to model against, which vendor accuracy claims do not. The number to interrogate is what counts as a new clinical finding, since that definition determines whether 50,000 represents meaningful catches or a high volume of flags a radiologist would have reached anyway. AVIA commissioning the work makes it more independent than a vendor case study and less independent than peer review, which is roughly where its evidentiary weight should sit.